Small religious group in the urban environment: failure of the Bahá’i project

Authors

  • Svetlana V. Ryazanova Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13a Lenin Street, Perm 614990, Russia; Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov, 23 Petropavlovskaya Street, Perm 614990, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-9387

Keywords:

new religious movements, Bahá’is, Perm Territory, channels of proselytism, social activities

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the proselytising strategy of the Bahá’i community in the Perm Territory that reflects the situation with this religious group in the Russian Federation as a whole. Bahá’i s are seen as one of the new religious projects of the end of the last century, claiming a wide coverage of believers and being unable to fulfill the task. The main research question is to identify obstacles for effective proselytising activities of new religious movements as features of the religious groups. The aim of the work is to identify effective mechanisms for recruiting neophytes in the urban environment, which involves channels for transmitting teachings, main factors of the proselytic potential of religion, the connection between doctrine, cult practice and the success of the missionary activity. The article presents the first experience of a sociological analysis of the regional Bahá’i community as a new religious movement in the post-Soviet space. The study is built on a set of included observations, results from a survey of church members, a series of semi-structured interviews, an analysis of sacred literature and information from social networks. Particular attention is paid to the specifics of the spread of the Bahá’i faith in the country and the social characteristics of the neophytes. The main types of religious and near-religious activities of the community and ways of attracting new followers are analysed. The reasons and factors of the curtailment of activity and decline of the community, as well as the chosen development tactics at the present stage, are identified. The Bahá’i community is treated as uncompetitive in the religious space of the region and country. This is determined by the high value of the individual qualities of the followers, a low degree of external attractiveness, and poor adaptation to the religious needs of the population. The analysis of the community allows us to establish the place of new religious movements in the social and cultural space and the prospects for their development as local communities.

Author Biography

  • Svetlana V. Ryazanova, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13a Lenin Street, Perm 614990, Russia; Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov, 23 Petropavlovskaya Street, Perm 614990, Russia

    doctor of science (philosophy), docent; leading researcher at the department for the study of Political Institutions and Processes, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and professor of the department of history and philosophy, faculty of land management, cadaster and construction technologies, Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov

References

  1. Bazhan TA. Oppozitsionnaya religioznost’ v Rossii [Oppositional religiosity in Russia]. Krasnoyarsk: [s. n.]; 2000. 371 p. Russian.
  2. Barker AV. Novye religioznye dvizheniya [New religious movements]. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute; 1997. 282 p. Russian.
  3. Kanterov IYa. Novye religioznye dvizheniya (vvedenie v osnovnye kontseptsii i terminy) [New religious movements (introduction to basic concepts and terms)]. Vladimir: Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Soletov; 2006. 385 p. Russian.
  4. Wilson BR. Absolutes and relatives: two problems for new religious movements. In: Beckford JA, Richardson JТ, еditоrs. Challenging Religion. Essays in honor of Eileen Barker. London: Routledge; 2003. р. 11–20.
  5. Wilson BR. Religious sects: a sociological study. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970. 256 p.
  6. Martinovich VA. To the history of the term «new religious movement». Sektovedenie. 2018;7:67–85. Russian.
  7. Balagushkin EG. Kritika sovremennykh netraditsionnykh religii. Istoki, sushchnost’, vliyanie na molodezh’ Zapada [Criticism of modern non-traditional religions. Origins, essence, influence on the youth of the West]. Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House; 1984. 285 p. Russian.
  8. Balagushkin EG. Netraditsionnye religii v kapitalisticheskikh stranakh Zapada i ikh vliyanie na molodezh’ [Non-traditional religions in the capitalist countries of the West and their impact on youth]. Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House; 1980. 103 p. Russian.
  9. Balagushkin EG. Netraditsionnye religii v sovremennoi Rossii. Chast’ 1 [Non-traditional religions in modern Russia. Part 1]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1999. 244 p. Russian.
  10. Grigulevich IR. Proroki «novoi istiny»: ocherki o kul’takh i sueveriyakh sovremennogo kapitalisticheskogo mira [Prophets of the «new truth»: essays on the cults and superstitions of the modern capitalist world]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1983. 303 p. Russian.
  11. Gurevich PS. Vozrozhden li mistitsizm? [Is mysticism revived?]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1984. 302 p. Russian.
  12. Gurevich PS. Sovremennye vnekonfessional’nye religioznye organizatsii na Zapade [Contemporary non-confessional religious organizations in the West]. Moscow: Znanie; 1983. 62 p. Russian.
  13. Gurevich PS. Netraditsionnye religii na Zapade i vostochnye religioznye kul’ty [Non-traditional religions in the West and Eastern religious cults]. Moscow: Znanie; 1985. 64 p. Russian.
  14. Klyuev BI. [Neo-religious movements in modern India]. Peoples of Asia and Africa. 1984;6:25–34. Russian.
  15. Matveev V. [Krsna’s devotees – who are they?]. Nauka i religiya. 1990;10:25–28. Russian.
  16. Mitrokhin LN. «Religioznye kul’ty» v SShA [«Religious Cults» in the United States]. Moscow: Znanie; 1984. 64 p. Russian.
  17. Mitrokhin LN. Religii «novogo veka» [Religions of the «new age»]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya; 1985. 164 p. Russian.
  18. Nikiforova B. [Searches of youth and «Jesus Movement»]. Nauka i religiya. 1976;5:78–80. Russian.
  19. Safronova ES. [The main directions of the spread of Zen Buddhism in the West]. In: Garaja VI, editor. Voprosy nauchnogo ateizma. Vypusk 38. Mistitsizm: problemy analiza i praktiki [Questions of scientific atheism. Issue 38. Mysticism: Problems of Analysis and Practice]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1989. p. 147–166. Russian.
  20. Tkacheva AA. Induistskie misticheskie organizatsii i dialog kul’tur [Hindu mystical organizations and dialogue of cultures]. Moscow: Nauka; 1989. 137 p. Russian.
  21. Tkacheva AA. [Krishna Hare]. Asia and Africa today. 1993;8:56–57. Russian.
  22. Tkacheva AA. [Neo-hindu mysticism]. In: Garaja VI, editor. Voprosy nauchnogo ateizma. Vypusk 38. Mistitsizm: problemy analiza i praktiki [Questions of scientific atheism. Issue 38. Mysticism: Problems of Analysis and Practice]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1989. p. 128–146. Russian.
  23. Tkacheva AA. «Novye religii» Vostoka [«New religions» of the East]. Moscow: Nauka; 1991. 216 p. Russian.
  24. Campbell BA. Typology of cults. Sociological Analysis. 1978;39(3):228–240. DOI: 10.2307/3710443.
  25. Robertson R. Religious movements and modern societies: toward a progressive problemshift. Sociological Analysis. 1979;40(4):297–314. DOI: 10.2307/3709959.
  26. Stone D. New religious consciousness and personal religious experience. Sociological Analysis. 1979;39(2):123–134. DOI: 10.2307/3710212.
  27. Ryazanova SV. [«Two islam» in the Perm region: true and imaginary conflicts]. Etnoreligioznaya konfliktologiya. 2011;1:78–87. Russian.
  28. Ryazanova SV. Regional orthodoxy: logic of evolution (Perm Krai). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. Philosophy. Conflict Studies. Culture Studies. Religious Studies. 2015;31(3):126–132. Russian.
  29. Ryazanova SV. The role of the regional factor determining the local religious situation. Vestnik Permskogo federal’nogo issledovatel’skogo tsentra. Russian. DOI: 10.7242/2658-705X/2019.1.5.
  30. Ryazanova SV, Zubareva EA. Orthodox believer of the Kama region: 20th–21st centuries. Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2014;1:5–16. Russian.
  31. Ryazanova SV, Sirotkin PF. Protestantism in province: the variants of evolution (Perm region). Voprosy kul’turologii. 2015;10:70–78. Russian.
  32. Rayzanova SV, Tsolova AI. Modern neo-paganism: classification, specifics and local variants. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2015;1:96–106. Russian.
  33. Martynenko AV. A little-known confessional history of Russia: the Bahá’i Faith and Ahmadiyya. «White Spots» of the Russian and World History. 2018;3;36–51. Russian.
  34. Yumabaeva DKh. [The history of the Bahá’i community in Russia and in Yekaterinburg]. In: Ivanova EV, Kuznetsova OV, editors. 30 let kafedre religiovedeniya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta [30 years of the department of religious studies of the Ural Federal University]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskoe predpriyatie «Maks-Info»; 2017. p. 206–208. Russian.
  35. Yashin VB. [From the history of the Bahá’i faith in Russia in the late 20th – early 21st centuries: Omsk community]. In: Ivanova EV, Kuznetsova OV, editors. 30 let kafedre religiovedeniya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta [30 years of the department of religious studies of the Ural Federal University]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskoe predpriyatie «Maks-Info»; 2017. p. 307–315. Russian.
  36. Lee AA. The Bahá’i Faith in Afrika. Soares B, Wijsen F, editors. Leiden: Brill; 2011. 292 p.
  37. Lawson T. Bahá’i religious history. Journal of Religious History. 2012;36(4):463–470. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2012.01224.x.
  38. Sabit-Sobhani A. Die Politischen Borschaften des Religionsgründers Bahá’u’llah [dissertation]. St. Gallen: Universität St. Gallen; 2000. 352 s.
  39. Hassall G. Pacific Bahái’s Communities 1950–1964. In: Rubinstein DH, editor. Pacific history. Papers from 8th Pacific history conference. Mangilao, Guam: University of Guam Press; 1992. p. 73–95.
  40. Hassall G. The Bahá’i Faith in the Pacific. Herda Ph, Reilly M, Hilliard D, editors. Vision and Reality in Pacific religion: Essays in Honour of Niel Gunson. Perth: Pandanus Books; 2005. p. 267–287.
  41. Akhmadulina SZ. History of the Bahá’i faith in Buryatia. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosydarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2010;7:121–124. Russian.
  42. Gruzkova EA. [D. V. Pivovarov and the formation of the Bahá’i community in Russia and in Yekaterinburg]. In: Ivanova EV, Kuznetsova OV, editors. 30 let kafedre religiovedeniya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta [30 years of the department of religious studies of the Ural Federal University]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskoe predpriyatie «Maks-Info»; 2017. p. 283–286. Russian.
  43. Litvinchuk VG. [The cluster period in the development of the Bahá’i faith in 1996–2016]. In: Ivanova EV, Kuznetsova OV, editors. 30 let kafedre religiovedeniya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta [30 years of the department of religious studies of the Ural Federal University]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskoe predpriyatie «Maks-Info»; 2017. p. 286–307. Russian.
  44. Mekhtieva OK. [From the history of the Bahá’i community in Russia and the USSR. Memoirs of eyewitnesses]. In: Ivanova EV, Kuznetsova OV, editors. 30 let kafedre religiovedeniya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta [30 years of the department of religious studies of the Ural Federal University]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’sko-poligraficheskoe predpriyatie «Maks-Info»; 2017. p. 174–187. Russian.
  45. Buck C. The Interracial Bahá’i Movement and the Black Intelligentsia. The Case of W. E. B. Du Bois. Journal of Religious History. 2012;(36)4:542–562. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2012.01230.x.
  46. Kargina IG. Sotsiologicheskie refleksii sovremennogo religioznogo plyuralizma [Sociological reflections of contemporary religious pluralism]. Moscow: MGIMO-University; 2014. 278 p. Russian.
  47. Fromm E. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1973. 521 p. Russian edition: Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoi destruktivnosti. Telyatnikova EM, translator. Moscow: AST; 2007. 624 p. Co-published by the «Midgard». (Zolotoi fond mirovoi klassiki. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Istoriya).

Downloads

Published

2021-04-13

Issue

No. 1 (2021): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

To Know so that to Foresee...

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Ryazanova, S.V. 2021. Small religious group in the urban environment: failure of the Bahá’i project. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 1 (Apr. 2021), 79–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2021-1-79-89.