Internal exposure dose rate from incorporated 137Cs in the muscular tissue of european roe deer, living in the territory of radioactive contamination
Abstract
The paper presents the results of estimating the absorbed dose rate from incorporated 137Cs in the muscle tissue of European roe deer living in territories with different densities of radioactive contamination. Sampling was carried out during 1991–2007 in the territories of Bragin, Narovlyansky and Khoiniksky districts, Gomel region. The control sample consisted of samples obtained in the Gomel region. An increase of the 137Cs contamination density leads to a nonlinear increase in the absorbed dose rate. Regardless the density of radioactive contamination of animal habitats, there is a high variation in the absorbed dose rate, which persists throughout the entire period of research. In the territory with a radioactive contamination density of 137Cs below 555 kBq/m2 during the observation period, no excess of the absorbed dose rate of internal radiation in the muscle tissue of roe deer above the critical screening value was found. Roe deer inhabit this territory with a low probability of dose effects. At the same time, the probability of fluctuations in the absorbed dose rate remains in the exclusion zone, the value of which goes beyond the screening value, which increases the probability of weak cytogenetic effects, affects the morbidity and reproductive system of animals.
References
- Environmental Protection – the Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants. Annals of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 108.2008;38(4–6).
- Brechignac F. Protection of the environment: how to position radioprotection in an ecological risk assessment perspective. The Science of the Total Environmental. 2003;307:35–54.
- Delistraty D. Radioprotection of nonhuman biota. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2008;99:1863–1869.
- Pentreath RJ. Ethics, genetics and dynamics: an emerging systematic approach to radiation protection of the environment.Journal Environment Radioactivity. 2004;74:19–30.
- Aleksahin PM. Radiatsionnaja zashchita okruzhajushchey sredy: antropotsentricheskiy i ekotsentricheskiy printsipy[Environmental radiation protection: anthropocentric and ecocentric principles]. Radiacionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya [Radiological biology. Radioecology]. 2004;44(1):93–103. Russian.
- Malinovskij GP. Otsenka doz vnutrennego obluchenija myshevidnykh gryzunov za schet Sr-90 [Evaluation of the doses of internal irradiation of mouse rodents due to Sr-90]. [PhD thesis]. Moscow: [publisher unknown]; 2014. Russian.
- Savkin MN, Vedernikova MV, Panchenko SV. Vzaimnoe vlijanie otkhodov zhivoy prirody i punktov zakhoronenijaradioaktivnykh otkhodov: ekologicheskaja i tekhnicheskajan bezopasnost’ [Mutual influence of wildlife and radioactive waste disposal sites:environmental and technical safety]. Radioaktivnye otkhody [Radioactive waste] 2018;3(4):30–38. Russian.
- Larsson C-M. Protection of the Environment. In: Activities of 5 Committee 3rd International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection; 2015 October 20–22; Seoul, Korea. Venue; Seoul: ICRP, KARP; 2015. 14 p.
- Andersson P, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Beresford NA, et al. Numerical benchmarks for protecting biota from radiation in the environment: proposed levels, underlying reasoning and recommendations. In: PROTECT Deliverable 5. EC contract number: 036425 (FI6R). 2008. 112 p.
- Rozhko AV, Vlasov OK, Chunihin LA, Drozdov DN. SICH-orientirovannyy metod otsenki doz vnutrennego obluchenija naselenija v otdalennyy period Chernobyl’skoy avaryi [WMS-based method for estimating annual doses of internal exposure to the population during the remote period of the Chernobyl accident]. Radiaciya i risk. Byulleten’ Nacional’nogo radiacionnoepidemiologicheskogo registra [Radiation and risk]. 2009;18(2):48–60. Russian.
- Kozorez AI. Resursy olen’ikh v Belarusi [Reindeer Resources of Belarus]. Lesnoe i okhotnich’e khozyajstvo [Forest and hunting]. 2014;11:42–47. Russian.
- Dunin VF, Voronetskij NN, Tishkevich VE, Eliashevuch NV, Piskunov VS, Parejko OA, Kireenko KM. Los’ i kosulya [Elk and Roe Deer]. In: Pikulik MM, editor. Priroda Polesskogo zapovednika [Nature of Polessky reserve]. Mozyr’: Belyj veter; 1999. 80 p. Russian.
- Voroneckij NN, Dunin VF, Piskunov VS, Kireenko KM. Chislennost’ i biotopicheskoe raspredeleniedikikh zhivotnykh v Polesskom radiatsionno-ekologicheskom zapovednike [The abundance and biotopic distribution of wild animals in the Polessky Radiation-Ecological Reserve. In: Biologicheskoe raznoobrazie Natsional’nogo parka «Pripyatskij» i drugikh osobo okhranaemykh territoriy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov, posvyashchennykh 30-letiyu Nacional’nogo parka «Pripyatskij» (1969–1999) [Biological diversity of the Pripyatsky National Park and other specially protected natural areas]. Turov–Mozyr’:[publisher unknown];1999. p. 312–315. Russian.
- Spirin EV. Metod rascheta doz obluchenija zhivotnykh dla otsenki posledstviyzagraznenija okruzhajushchey sredy [Method for calculating animal radiation doses for assessing the effects of environmental pollution]. Radiacionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya. [Radiological biology. Radioecology]. 2009;49(5):608–616. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.