Digging activity of the common mole under the conditions of Belarus and the need for its scaring

  • Olga G. Gorovykh
  • Yuri S. Dubnovitsky
  • Konstantin F. Saevich

Abstract

The article presents the data of hunting for the mole in the republic in the last century, during the period when the hunting for the mole was carried out, the factors contributing to the increase in the number of the mole population at the present time are indicated: the absence of natural enemies, the adequacy of the food supply throughout the year, the lack of industrial catching. New data on the average size of molehills are given: diameter Dcr = 28 ± 2 cm, height Hcr = 9.7 ± 0.6 cm and their number in the studied areas of the Pruzhany region. Based on the data of counting molehills in Dzerzhinsky, Stolbtsovsky, Uzdensky, Pruzhany and Pinsk districts in areas under natural grasses or sown with cereal crops, an average number of molehills in the Brest region was established, which amounted to 36 molehills (average area 2.2 m2) per plot 10×10 m2, which is about 2 % of the total area. An approximate area was determined, amounting to 21.5 thousand hectares, located under molehills in the Brest region. The influence of the mole on the amount of processed land and the humus formation associated with this, depending on the intensity of catching, is considered; this year, this value amounted to 15.202 million tons of soil. The need to scare away moles, at least from areas of intensive visitation by people and domestic animals (garden plots) was noted due to the high infection of moles with ectoparasites dangerous to humans and animals. Information is provided on a new mole repeller developed in Belarus and mastered for production, based on calcium sulfate dihydrate, which does not contain pesticides and does not lead to the death of animals, but helps to leave the territory treated with this mole repeller.

References

  1. Yakovlev AA, Babich NV. Kroty i zashchita ot nikh. Zashchita i karantin rasteniy [Protection and quarantine of plants]. 2015;2:34–37. Russian.
  2. Mole fishing supports the last of the Mohicans. Delovoy Peterburg [Business Petersburg]. 2001;4.09. Russian.
  3. Sarafanov A. Mole fishing. Ural’skiy sledopyt [Ural tracker]. 1939;5:64-66. Russian.
  4. Berton R. Chuvstva zhivotnykh [Feelings of animals]. Moscow: Mir; 1972. 220 p. Russian.
  5. Burko LD, Grichuk VV. Pozvonochnyye zhivotnyye Belarusi [Vertebrates of Belarus]. Minsk: BGU; 2004. 391 p. Russian.
  6. Strannyye eksperimenty sera Charl’za. Nauka i zhizn’ [Science and life]. 2018;12:46–61. Russian.
  7. Catania KC. Stereo and serial sniffing guide navigation to an odor source in a mammal. Nature Communications. 2013;4:1441.
  8. Marinin LI, Shishkova NA, Mokriyevich AN, Dyatlov IA. Rol’ dozhdevykh chervey v rasprostranenii sibirskoy yazvy. Bakteriologiya [Bacteriology.] 2020;5(4):30-34. DOI: 10.20953/2500-1027-2020-4-30-34. Russian.
  9. Skoczen S. On food storage of the Mole, Talpa europaea Linnaeus 1758. Acta Theriologica. Bialowieza.1961:2;23–43.
  10. Jimеnez R, Burgos M, Barrionuevo FJ. The Biology and Evolution of Fierce Females (Moles and Hyenas). Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2022;11:97–114.
  11. Zhivotnyy mir Belarusi. Pozvonochnyye. Krot yevropeyskiy [Fauna of Belarus. Vertebrates. European mole – Talra europaea Linnaeus]. Minsk: BSU Publishing Center; 2013. p. 315–316. Russian.
  12. Serzhanin IN. Mlekopitayushchiye Belarusi [Mammals of Belarus]. Minsk: Academy of Sciences of the Byelorussian SSR; 1961.321 p. Russian.
  13. Domenico Prisa. Earthworm humus for the growth of vegetable plants. Sustainable Food Systems. 2019;5:968–969.
  14. Falkenstein BYu. Status and prospects of mole fishing in the Leningrad region. In: Promyslovaya fauna i okhotnich’ye khozyaystvo Severo-Zapada RSFSR [Commercial fauna and hunting economy of the North-West of the RSFSR, Sat. Promohotbiostantsii]. Moscow, Leningrad: Type named Lokhankov; 1934. 96 p. Russian.
  15. Galantsev VP., Rusakov OS. Some features of the structure of the circulatory system of the mole in connection with the ecological characteristics of the species. Sbornik nauchno-tekhnicheskoy informatsii «Okhota, pushnina i dich» [Collection of scientific and technical information «Hunting, furs and game»]. Kirov: Economics, 1967. Volume 20. p. 27–30. Russian.
  16. Pilipko EN, Kharchenko NN, Vernodubenko VS. Soil-forming significance of the enduring (redepositing) activity of the European mole (talpa europaea, L) in the taiga biogeocenosis. Biosfera [Biosphere]. 2020;4:223–230. Russian.
  17. Zhyvol’ny svet Belarusi [Life is the light of Belarus]. Minsk: Belaruskaya Savetskaya Entsyklapedyya; 1978. 220 p. Belarusian.
  18. Voitekhov MJ. On some factors limiting the soil-forming role of earthworms in the European part of the taiga zone of Russia. Pochvy i okruzhayushchaya sreda [Soils and the environment]. 2018;4:267–274. Russian.
  19. Nikitchenko NT. Nasekomoyadnyye (Insectivora) i ikh ektoparazity na territorii Tsentralnoy Lesostepi Ukrainy. Fundament. i prikladnyye problemy nauki [Foundation. and applied problems of science]. Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnjgj simpoziuma. – Moscow: RAN; 2011. Part 3. p. 48–59. Russian.
  20. Nikitchenko NT. Ektoparazity krota obyknovennogo (Talpa europaea L.) v usloviyakh Tsentral’noy Lesostepi Ukrainy. Priroda Zakhídnogo Políssya ta prileglikh teritoríy [Nature of the Western Polissia and adjacent territories]. Bíologíya. 2011. Volume 8. p. 168–173
  21. Catania KC. All in the Family – Touch Versus Olfaction in Moles. American Association for Anatom. 2019;1:65–76.
Published
2023-11-03
Keywords: common mole, wormholes, damage, earthworms
How to Cite
Gorovykh, O., Dubnovitsky, Y., & Saevich, K. (2023). Digging activity of the common mole under the conditions of Belarus and the need for its scaring. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology, 1. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/ecology/article/view/5868
Section
The Study and Rehabilitation of Ecosystems