Socio-professional structure of the Belarusian-Russian-Ukrainian border area rural population on the eve of the Second World War
Keywords:
rural population, social structure, professional composition, Belarusian-Russian-Ukrainian border area, population dynamics, gender imbalance, modernization, collective farmers, workers, employees, artisans, individual farmers, specialists, managers, engaged in agriculture, distribution of the population by sources of livelihood, Belarusian specificsAbstract
The article comprehensively examines the original archival materials of the 1939 census and analyzes the social structure and professional composition of the rural population of the Belarusian-Russian-Ukrainian border region, the development of which for «strategic reasons» was not a priority in the plans of the Soviet mobilization modernization. It highlights main reasons and stages of gender imbalance development, changes in rural population of the region dynamics, in which the titular ethnic groups absolutely dominated and more than half were women. The historical and comparative analysis allowed us to establish a number of specific features of rural population socio-professional structure in the Belarusian part of the border region, which is emphasized in the article. The share of the titular ethnic group among specialists, education workers, service workers, new professions related to maintenance of machinery and mechanisms, planning and selection work, and professional activities requiring high qualifications and education was lower in the Belarusian regions compared to Russian and Ukrainian ones. The author concluded that technical and socio-cultural modernization in agriculture in Belarusian village took place more slowly than in neighboring border regions, as evidenced by the socio-professional appearance of its rural population on the eve of the Second World War, which interrupted this progressive process.
References
- Ivanov RF, editor. Regiony i regionalizm v stranakh Zapada i Rossii [Regions and regionalism in the countries of the West and Russia]. Moscow: Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of Science; 2001. 260 p. Russian.
- Khodzin SМ. Belaruskaja vjoska w mizhvaenny chas: shljahi i formy saveckaj madjernizacyi (1921–1939) [Belarusian village in the interwar period: ways and forms of Soviet modernization (1921–1939)]. Міnsk: Belarusian State University; 2014. 240 p. Belarusian.
- Smolij VA, editor. Istorija ukrai’ns’kogo seljanstva. Tom 2 [History of the Ukrainian peasantry. Volume 2]. Кyiv: Naukova dumka; 2006. 656 p. Ukrainian.
- Krawchenko B. Social change and national consciousness in twentieth-century Ukraine. London: Macmillan Press Ltd; 1985. XVI + 268 p. Ukrainian edition: Kravchenko B. Social’ni zminy i nacional’na svidomist’ v Ukrai’ni XX st. Ivashko V, Kornijenko V, translators. Kyiv: Osnovy; 1997. 423 p.
- Romantsov VO. Naselennja Ukrai’ny i jogo ridna mova za chasiv radjans’koi vlady ta nezalezhnosti (XX – pochatok XXI stolittja) [The population of Ukraine and its native language during the period of radyanskoi power and independence (20th – early 21st century)]. Кyiv: Olena Teliga publishing house; 2000. 184 p. Ukrainian.
- Zhiromskaya VB. Demograficheskaya istoriya Rossii v 1930-e gg. Vzglyad v neizvestnoe [Demographic history of Russia in the 1930s. A look into the unknown]. Мoscow: ROSSPEN; 2001. 280 p. Russian.
- Yastrebitskaya AL, Blok M. [Apology of comparative history of European societies (abstract)]. In: Yastrebitskaya AL, editor. XX vek: metodologicheskie problemy istoricheskogo poznaniya. Chast’ 2 [20th century: methodological problems of historical knowledge. Part 2]. Мoscow: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2001. p. 14–29. Russian.
- Barg MA, Chernyak YB. [Region as a category of internal typologization of class-antagonistic formations]. In: Zhukov VM, editor. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsii. (Istoriko-tipologicheskie issledovaniya) [Problems of socio-economic formations. (Historical and typological research)]. Мoscow: Nauka; 1975. p. 39–49. Russian.
- Koval’chenko ID, Borodkin LI. [Agrarian typology of the provinces of European Russia at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries (experience of multidimensional quantitative analysis)]. Istoriya SSSR. 1979;1:59–95. Russian.
- Borodkin LI. Mnogomernyi statisticheskii analiz v istoricheskikh issledovaniyakh [Multidimensional statistical analysis in historical research]. Мoscow: Publishing House of the Moscow State University; 1986. 188 p. Russian.
- Koka Yu. [Current trends and current problems of historical science in the world]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. 2003;3:17–20. Russian.
- Starovoitov MI. [The level of literacy and education of the East Slavic population of the Belarusian-Russian-Ukrainian border area (1920s–1930s)]. Belaruski gistarychny chasopis. 2009;10:49–56. Belarusian.
- Starovoitov MI. [National and social composition of the military personnel of the Belarusian military district on the eve of the Second World War]. Ideologicheskie aspekty voennoi bezopasnosti. 2018;1:8–15. Russian.
- Starovoitov MI. Handicraftsmen and self-employed farmers of Byelorussian-Russian-Ukrainian Frontier in the end 1930s (sociocultural aspect). Izvestiya Gomel’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni F. Skoriny. 2011;5:112–121. Russian.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)














