The Union State: a changing relationship between Belarus and Russia

Abstract

In December 2018, the Russian president Vladimir Putin and Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko agreed to set up an intergovernmental working group on the development of further integration of the Union State A. Lukashenko had been reluctant to yield more Belarusian sovereignty over to Russia. However, a dispute regarding compensating Belarus for a Russian oil tax manoeuvre prompted Moscow to revisit the oldest disagreement: the 1999 Union State Treaty. Russia presented Belarus what sounded like an ultimatum: financial support in return for greater integration with the Russian Federation. This essay will explore the uncertain future and relationship between Belarus and its supposedly closest ally Russia. Chapter one will discuss the early relationship between the countries following the collapse of the USSR. Following that, the second chapter will discuss the relationship between A. Lukashenko and V. Putin and their conflicting ideas of the future of the Union State, up until the 2014 Ukrainian crisis and the deterioration of their relationship. The third chapter will discuss the Russian government’s effort at reviving the Union State, including its successes and shortcomings. The fourth chapter will look at the Belarusian response drawing on some primary research (interviews and official documents analysis) carried out to examine the Belarusian perspective in greater detail. Finally, the essay will conclude with an outlook on the future of the Union State and the relations between Belarus and Russia, using a classical realist approach.

Author Biography

George Polglase-Korostelev, GCRF COMPASS Affiliate, University of Bath, Clawerton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, Great Britain

bachelor (political science)

References

  1. Korosteleva E, Lawson C, Marsh R, editors. Contemporary Belarus – between democracy and dictatorship. London: Routledge; 2003. 256 p.
  2. Nohlen D, Stöver P. Elections in Europe: a data handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2010. 2102 p.
  3. Ioffe G. Understanding Belarus: economy and political landscape. Europe-Asia Studies. 2004;56(1):85–118.
  4. Brzezinski Z, Sullivan P. Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States: documents, data, and analysis. New York: M. E. Sharpe; 1997. 866 p.
  5. Martynau A. Political bargaining in the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Contemporary European Studies. 2013;1(2): 27–44.
  6. Vieira A. A tale of two unions: Russia – Belarus integration experience and its lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies. 2016;32(1):41–53.
  7. Preiherman Y. Treaty on the establishment of the Union State of Belarus and Russia [Internet; cited 2020 January 31]. Available from: http://minskdialogue.by/en/research/memorable-notes/treaty-on-the-establishment-of-the-union-state-ofbelarus-and-russia.
  8. Simon G. On the customs union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia. Economic Annals. 2010;55:7–28.
  9. Donaldson R, Nogee J. The foreign policy of Russia: changing systems, enduring interests. London: M. E. Sharpe; 2009. 456 p.
  10. Tarr D. The Eurasian Customs Union among Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan: can it succeed where its predecessor failed? Eastern European Economics. 2016;54(1):1–22.
  11. Bird M. Russia’s new Eurasian Economic Union could get its own single currency [Internet; cited 2020 January 31]. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-eurasian-economic-union-could-get-its-own-single-currency-2015-3.
  12. Astapenia R. Belarus and the Eurasian Economic Union: the view from Minsk [Internet; cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_belarus_and_the_eurasian_economic_union_the_view_from_minsk.
  13. Yeliseyeu A. Belarus and the EAEU: expectations vs reality [Internet; cited 2020 May 7]. Available from: https://visegradinsight.eu/belarus-and-the-eaeu-expectations-vs-reality/.
  14. Kuleszewicz A. External and internal policies of Belarus after Crimea annexation. Polish Political Science Review. 2016;4(1):33–43.
  15. Korosteleva E. The European Union, Russia and the Eastern region: the analytics of government for sustainable cohabitation. Cooperation and Conflict. 2016;51(3):365–383.
  16. Portela C. The European Union and Belarus: sanctions and partnership? Comparative European Politics. 2011;9(4–5): 486–505.
  17. Gromadzki G. The Eastern partnership after 10 years: time for deep rethinking [Internet; cited 2020 February 1]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536438/EXPO_STU(2015)536438_EN.pdf.
  18. Marples D. The Eastern Partnership project in Ukraine and Belarus [Internet; cited 2020 February 1]. Available from: https://neweasterneurope.eu/2019/05/02/the-eastern-partnership-project-in-ukraine-and-belarus/.
  19. McKenzie B. Russia repeals oil export duties [Internet; cited 2020 February 3]. Available from: https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2018/10/russia-repeals-oil-export-duties.
  20. Oversloot H. The politics of energy dependency. Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania between domestic oligarchs and Russian pressure. East European Politics. 2014;30(2):289–291.
  21. Balmforth T. Russia complains over Belarus’s refusal to host air base [Internet; cited 2020 March 10]. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-belarus-airbase/russia-complains-over-belaruss-refusal-to-host-air-base-idUSKBN1WB1NT.
  22. Bunce V, Wolchik S. Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 386 p.
  23. Lough J. Integration on hold for Russia and Belarus [Internet; cited 2020 March 10]. Available from: https://www. chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/integration-hold-russia-and-belarus.
  24. Mammadov R. Belarus’s role in East European energy geopolitics [Internet; cited 2020 March 10]. Available from: https://jamestown.org/program/belaruss-role-in-east-european-energy-geopolitics/.
  25. Gehrke J. Western allies are worried Russia could take over a neighbour to keep Putin alive and in power [Internet; cited 2020 February 3]. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.com/western-allies-worry-russia-could-annex-belarus-for-putin-2019-12.
  26. Roth A. Putin backs proposal allowing him to remain in power in Russia beyond 2024 [Internet; cited 2020 April 28]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/10/vladimir-putin-amendment-power-russia-2024.
  27. Williams M. Why ideas matter in international relations: Hans Morgenthau, classical realism, and the moral construction of power politics. International Organization. 2004;58:633–665.
  28. Lebow R. Classical realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 60–67.
Published
2020-12-29
Keywords: Union State, Russia, Belarus, European Union, US, Eurasian Economic Union, A. Lukashenko, NATO, integration, sovereignty
How to Cite
Polglase-Korostelev, G. (2020). The Union State: a changing relationship between Belarus and Russia. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 2, 38-46. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/internationalRelations/article/view/3170
Issue
No 2 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations
Section
International relations

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)