Why China – US confrontation persists: the unabated ideological conflict
Abstract
The opposition between China and the US is a reflection of the major global contests of the 21st century. At its core, this conflict represents a rivalry between two distinct ideologies: liberal democracy and socialism with Chinese characteristics. Driven by these divergent ideological frameworks, Beijing and Washington exhibit uncompromising stances on a myriad of issues including the trade war, the Covid-19 pandemic, the special military operation in Ukraine, and the situation in Taiwan. The essence of this ongoing ideological struggle stems from the inability of US values, which champion a “free world”, to reconcile with China’s ideological objectives. The critical question about how will the escalating ideological conflict influence the global order amidst Sino-American rivalry still needs to be answered.
References
- Weisiger A. Ideology, ideologues, and war [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 November 2]. Available from: https://www.polisci.upenn.edu/~weisiger/Ideology_midwest.pdf.
- Brands H. Democracy vs authoritarianism: how ideology shapes great-power conflict. Global Politics and Strategy. 2018;60(5):61–114. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2018.1518371.
- Friedberg AL. Competing with China. Survival. 2018;60(3):7–64. DOI:10.1080/00396338.2018.1470755.
- Chhabra T. The China challenge, democracy, and U. S. grand strategy [Internet; cited 2023 November 2]. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/FP_20190311_us_grand_strategy_chhabra.pdf.
- Yan Xuetong. Chinese values vs liberalism: what ideology will shape the international normative order? The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2018;11(1):1–22. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poy001.
- Wang Jisi. From cooperative partnership to strategic competition: a review of China – U. S. relations 2009–2019. China International Strategy Review. 2019;1:1–10. DOI:10.1007/s42533-019-00007-w.
- Wu Xinbo. The China challenge: competitor or order transformer? The Washington Quarterly. 2020;43:99–114. DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2020.1813402.
- Labunski R. James Madison and the struggle for the Bill of rights. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. 337 p.
- Di Nunzio MR. Woodrow Wilson: essential writings and speeches of the scholar-president. New York: New York University Press; 2006. 429 p.
- Singh B, Teo S, editors. Multilateralism in the Indo-Pacific: the quadrilateral security dialogue, Lancang – Mekong cooperation mechanism, and ASEAN. New York: Routledge; 2020. 144 p.
- Christianson J, Monaghan S, Cooke D. AUKUS pillar two: advancing the capabilities of the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. Washington: Center for Strategic & International Studies; 2023. 10 p.
- Ikenberry GJ. Why American power endures. The U. S.-led order isn’t in decline. Foreign Affairs. 2023;101:56–73. 216 p.
- Turner O. American images of China: identity, power, policy. New York: Routledge; 2014. 226 p.
- Baru S, Sharma R. A new cold war: Henry Kissinger and the rise of China. New York: HarperCollins; 2021. 320 p.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)