Waterway shipping and transit in Soviet-Polish relations in 1924–1933
Abstract
This article examines the nuances of Soviet-Polish relations from 1921 to 1939, focusing on efforts to establish an effective transport and logistics model for border waterways. Although the Riga peace treaty of 18 March 1921, broadly addressed this issue, several political challenges needed to be overcome to fully resolve it, including devising suitable forms for transit trade operations, concluding a trade agreement, and finding a compromise in the Polish-Lithuanian conflict. Optimal export – import operations between the two parties hinged on their willingness to reach bilateral agreements and conventions. The study finds that using border rivers as secondary routes for transporting export goods from the BSSR to Poland and other Western markets was practical primarily for timber supplies. Wood rafting occurred along the rivers Viliya, Iliya, Dvinosa, Western Dvina, Sluch, Moroch, and Neman. Belarusian and allied timber processing organisations (such as “Zapadoles”, “Lesbel”, “Belsplavkontora”, and “Soyuzlesosplav”) sought to maximise the efficiency of these waterways due to their proximity to rich forests. The article highlights that following the Non-aggression treaty on 25 July 1932, and the subsequent warming of Soviet-Polish relations, the issue of water navigation and rafting was addressed by the Convention on the rafting of forest materials along border rivers of 9 June 1933. Before this convention, local agreements between border officials were used to manage the transportation of forest materials along these waterways. Despite the Königsberg convention of 1925 and the organisation of timber rafting to Memel via Latvia along the Western Dvina, the use of Polish commercial intermediaries (such as company “Dawa-Britopol”) did not resolve the issue of rafting wood along the river Neman in 1924–1925. By the early 1930s, as the Neman problem became less relevant due to logistical inefficiencies, Soviet authorities sought alternative routes via the rivers Sluch and Moroch. These routes also faced political obstacles, with the Polish side leveraging economic means to address political issues, including the illegal crossing of the Soviet-Polish border and the subsequent detention of individuals sympathetic to the Soviet regime and Communist party.
References
- Adamaytis I. [Our export and foreign market (based on the materials of a business trip abroad)]. Sovetskoe stroitel’stvo. 1928;5:2–5. Russian.
- Teumin I. [Unification of the Western region from the point of view of foreign trade]. Narodnoe khozyaistvo Belorussii. 1922;2–3:2–47. Russian.
- Leczyk M. [Trade and economic relations between Poland and the USSR]. In: Kostyushko II, Bazylev L, editors. Ocherki istorii sovetsko-pol’skikh otnoshenii. 1917–1977 [Essays on the history of Soviet-Polish relations. 1917–1977]. Moscow: Nauka; 1979. p. 177–201. Russian.
- Leczyk M. Polityka II Rzeczypospolitej wobec ZSRR w latach 1925-1934. Studium z historii dyplomacji. 1976;1:17-34. Polish.
- Łopatniuk S. Sprawa zawarcia traktatu handlowego w stosunkach polsko-radzieckich (1925–1928). Z dziejów stosunków polsko¬radzieckich.1969;4:85–104. Polish.
- Olszanski PN. Starania rzadu Radzieckiego o wznowienie stosunkow gospodarczych z Polska w 1923 r. Z dziejow stosunkow polsko-radzieckich. Studia i materiały. 1975;11–12:112. Polish.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)