Structural and quantitative similarities and differences of homoparadigms in Belarusian and Italian languages (based on the material of explanatory dictionaries)
Abstract
The structural and quantitative characteristics of homonymous paradigms in Belarusian and Italian languages are defined and compared. The general and specific aspects of approaches to the description of homonyms in lexicographical sources are specified, quantitative and structural similarities and differences between homoparadigms are revealed. Depending on the characteristics of the component of homoparadigm, the following types were identified: identical and mixed (according to the quantitative parameter); homogeneous and combined (according to the morphological affiliation of the component); graphical and phonetical-graphical (according to the form of coincidence of structural units). According to functional and stylistic features, seven types were identified, five of which are common to both languages.
References
- Потебня АА. Из записок по русской грамматике. Москва: Учпедгиз; 1958. 500 с.
- Айвазова ЭР. Семантико-функциональные парадигмы лексики. Культура народов Причерноморья. Вопросы духовнойкультуры.Филологические науки. 2006;88:158–161.
- Жеребило ТВ. Словарь лингвистических терминов. Назрань: Пилигрим; 2010. 486 с.
- Малаховский ЛВ. Теория лексической и грамматической омонимии. Москва: Либроком; 2009. 248 с.
- Fanfani M. Dizionari del Novecento. Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina; 2019. 165 p.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)
