The role of religion in the concepts of A. Toynbee and S. Huntington: common and different

Abstract

The article examines the role of religion in the concepts of local civilisations by A. Toynbee and S. Huntington. The main ideas of the theory by A. Toynbee, where the significance of religion is enhanced during the period of the collapse of civilisations, are presented. As a bearer of the spiritual heritage, the church becomes a «chrysalis» that transfers energy from a dying civilisation to a daughter one. In the highest religions, which are able to appeal to the human soul, A. Toynbee sees the potential for achieving universal human unity aimed at achieving the common good. At the same time, history reveals a regression of the highest religions that have departed from their original state due to the imperfection of human nature. Achievement of unity will be possible when the followers of living higher religions (Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism) realise the commonality of their history and abandon the struggle among themselves. In contrast, the idea of a conflict between carriers of different religious worldviews was developed by S. Huntington. He sees in religions a factor not of unification, but of division, since they not only draw resources from the spiritual potential of a person, but also endow his cultural identity and his mission with comprehensive unique symbols. Differences in world outlook and culture are fundamental, which makes the possibility of peaceful coexistence of representatives of different civilisations difficult to realise. In this way, if A. Toynbee recognises the idea of creating the inner unity of mankind on the basis of religion, then S. Huntington fundamentally denies it and asserts about impending conflicts on the «fault lines of civilisations».

Author Biography

Yanina A. Korshunova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social sciences; lecturer at the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Kosminskii EA. [Arnold Toynbee's reactionary historiosophy]. In: Kosminskii EA. Problemy angliiskogo feodalizma i istoriografii srednikh vekov [Problems of English feudalism and the historiography of the Middle Ages]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR; 1963. p. 285–357. Russian.
  2. Chesnokov GD. Sovremennaya burzhuaznaya filosofiya istorii: kriticheskii ocherk [Contemporary bourgeois philosophy of history: a critical sketch]. Gorky: Volgo-Vyatskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo; 1972. 207 p. Russian.
  3. Vorob’eva OV. [Toynbee: an experience of comprehension of history]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2020 December 26];5:86–98. Available from: http://vivovoco.astronet.ru/VV/JOURNAL/NEWHIST/TOYNBEE.HTM. Russian.
  4. Piel G. The West is best. Foreign affairs. 1993;72(4):57.
  5. Elliott M. When cultures collide. Washington post. 1996 December 1.
  6. Nazaretyan AP. «Clash of civilizations» and «End of history». Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 1994;6:140–146. Russian.
  7. Grigor’eva KS. The clash of civilizations in Bashkortostan? An empirical test of S. Huntington’s thesis. Vlast’. 2018;26(7):190–197. Russian. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v26i7.5976.
  8. Toynbee AJ. Postizhenie istorii. [A study of history]. Zharkov ED, translator. Moscow: Airis-Press; 2010. 640 p. Russian. (Biblioteka istorii i kul’tury).
  9. Boychuk SS. Religion and civilisation: the understanding of religion in the philosophy of history of A. J. Toynbee in the context of the civilisational approach. Heritage Institute Journal [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 December 29];2. Available from: http://nasledie-journal.ru/ru/journals/214.html. Russian.
  10. Huntington SP. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1996. 368 p. Russian edition: Huntington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii. Velimeev T, Novikov Yu, translators. Moscow: AST; 2003. 603 p.
Published
2021-07-01
Keywords: religion, civilisation, concepts of local civilisations, culture, A. Toynbee, S. Huntington
How to Cite
Korshunova, Y. A. (2021). The role of religion in the concepts of A. Toynbee and S. Huntington: common and different. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 67-72. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/3590
Issue
No 2 (2021): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology
Section
Social Philosophy

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)