Axiological status of social capital in the structure of intangible resources of contemporary society

Abstract

The article analyses the structure, the main factors in the formation of social capital, as well as the prerequisites for the emergence of its concept in modern social science. Structural elements of social capital, their place in the system of intangible resources of society are revealed. The article author has distinguished and characterised the basic projections of social capital (societal, axiological and institutional) and their parameters. The significant status of social capital in the transition of contemporary society to the post-industrial stage context had substantiated (P. Bourdieu, J. Coleman, R. Putnam, F. Fukuyama, D. M. Bulynko, A. N. Danilov, D. G. Rotman, A. I. Zelenkov, V. T. Novikov). Systemic analysis of contemporary Belarusian society’s social capital dynamics had performed.

Author Biography

Julia V. Dedolko, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

senior lecturer at the department of philosophy and methodology of science, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Dedolko YuV. [Heuristic potential of I. Wallerstein’s metadisciplinary methodology in social capital research]. In: Gurbo TL, compiler. Aktual’nye voprosy antropologii. Vypusk 10. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2015. р. 149–158. Russian.
  2. Dedolko YuV. [Transdisciplinary research and integrative status of philosophy in development of the concept of social capital]. In: Subbotina ND, editor. Problema sootnosheniya estestvennogo i sotsial’nogo v obshchestve i cheloveke. Materialy IX Vserossiiskoi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchnoi konferentsii; 14–15 maya 2018 g.; Chita, Russia [The problem of the relationship between the natural and the social in society and man. Materials of the 9th All-Russian scientific conference with international participation; 2018 May 14–15; Chita, Russia]. Chita: Transbaikal State University; 2018. р. 36–51. Russian.
  3. Dedolko YuV. [Social capital as a factor of the socio-cultural development of Belarus in the globalisation context]. In: Zelenkov AI, editor. Dialog tsivilizatsii v usloviyakh global’noi ekologicheskoi nestabil’nosti. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh; 24 maya 2012 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Dialogue of civilisations in the context of global environmental instability. Materials of the International scientific conference of young scientists; 2012 May 24; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2013. p. 179–183. Russian.
  4. Hanifan LJ. State supervisor of rural schools. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1916;67:130–138.
  5. Kapelyushnikov RI. [Gary Becker’s economic approach to human behaviour] [Internet]. SShA: ekonomika, politika, ideologiya. 1993 [cited 2018 May 16];11. Available from: http://www.libertarium.ru/68397. Russian.
  6. Bourdieu P. Le sens pratique. Рaris: Les Éditions de minuit; 1980. 480 р. Russian edition: Bourdieu P. Prakticheskii smysl. Shmatko NA, translator. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2001. 562 p.
  7. Bourdieu P. [Forms of capital]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2014 May 23];3(5):60–74. Available from: https://ecsoc.hse.ru/data/2011/12/08/1208205039/ecsoc_t3_n5.pdf. Russian.
  8. Coleman J. [Social and human capital]. Social sciences and contemporary world. 2001;3:122–139. Russian.
  9. Putnam RD. Social capital: measurement and consequences [Internet]. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [cited 21 May 2018]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/1825848.pdf.
  10. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy [Internet]. 1995 [cited 21 May 2018];1:65–78. Available from: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/detoc/assoc/bowling.html.
  11. Fukuyama F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press; 1996. 480 р. Russian edition: Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. Kolopotin M, editor; Pavlova D, Kiryushchenko V, Kolopotin M, translators. Moscow: AST; 2004. 730 p. (Philosophy). Co-published by the «Ermak».
  12. Malinowski B. The dynamics of culture change. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1945. 196 р. Russian edition: Malinowski B. Izbrannoe: dinamika kul’tury. Nikolaev VG, Porus VN, Trubochkin DV, translators. Saint Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; 2015. 462 p.
  13. Malinowski B. Magic, science and religion and other essays. New York: Free Press; 1948. 344 р. Russian edition: Malinowski B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. Khomin AP, translator. Moscow: Refl-buk; 1998. 288 p.
  14. Malinowski B. A scientific theory of culture and other essays. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1990. 238 р. Russian edition: Malinovskii B. Nauchnaya teoriya kul’tury [A scientific theory of culture and other essays]. Utekhin IV, translator. Moskow: United Humanities Publishing House; 2005. 184 p.
  15. Mauss M. The gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies [Internet; cited 2018 May 19]. Available from: http://anthro-economicus.narod.ru/files/Moss_Present.pdf.
  16. Polanyi K. The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon press; 2001. 357 р. Russian edition: Polan’i K. Velikaya transformatsiya. Politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni. Shurbelev AP, Fedorov SE, Vasil’ev AA, translators. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2002. 311 p.
  17. dе Tocqueville А. Demokratiya v Amerike [Democracy in America]. Oleinik VT, Orlova EP, Malakhova IA, Ivanyan IE, Vorozhtsova BN, translators. Moscow: Progress; 1992. 554 p. Russian.
  18. Bychenkov VM. [Institute social]. In: Stepin VV, editor. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [Internet]. Moscow: Mysl’; 2010 [cited 17 November 2021]. 744 р. Available from: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASHd07a46272f09e63e74c0d0. Russian.
  19. Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press; 1992. 418 р. Russian edition: Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek. Levin MB, translator. Moscow: AST; 2004. 588 p.
  20. Gregory A. Millennials more disillusioned with democracy than any generation in living memory, research suggests [Internet]. Independent. 2020 [cited 17 November 2021]. Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/millennials-democracy-populism-cambridge-generation-x-boomers-study-b1155826.html.
  21. Stapleton J. New report: Freedom in the world 2020 finds established democracies are in decline [Internet]. Freedom House. 2020 [cited 17 November 2021]. Available from: https://freedomhouse.org/article/new-report-freedom-world-2020- finds-established-democracies-are-decline.
  22. Bulynko DM, Danilov AN, Rotman DG, editors. Tsennostnyi mir sovremennogo cheloveka: Belarus’ v proekte «Issledovanie evropeiskikh tsennostei» [The valuable world of modern man: Belarus in the project «Research of European values»]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2009. 228 р. Russian.
  23. Bulynko DM, Danilov AN, Rotman DG, editors. Tsennostnyi mir sovremennogo cheloveka: Belarus’ i ee sosedi v mezhdunarodnykh proektakh po izucheniyu tsennostei [The valuable world of modern man: Belarus and its neighbours in international projects for the study of values]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2013. 175 р. Russian.
  24. Bulynko DM, Danilov AN, Rotman DG, Pravdivets VV, editors.Tsennostnyi mir sovremennogo cheloveka: strany Vostochnogo partnerstva, Evropeiskii soyuz i Rossiya v mezhdunarodnykh proektakh po izucheniyu tsennostei [The world of values of modern man: the countries of the Eastern Partnership, the European Union and Russia in international projects for the study of values]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. 219 p. Russian.
  25. Bulynko DM, Rotman DG, editors. Tsennostnyi mir sovremennogo cheloveka: proekt «Issledovanie evropeiskikh tsennostei», volna-2018 [The value world of modern man: the project «Research of European values», wave-2018]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2019. 191 p. Russian.
  26. Zelenkov AI, Rotman DG, Kherpfer Kh. [Belarusian quality of life]. Belaruskaja dumka. 2004;3:31–40. Russian.
  27. Novikov VТ, Kandrichin NА. [The values and the development priorities of modern East Slavic civilization]. Vesnik BDU. Seryja 3. Gistoryja. Filasofija. Psihalogija. Palitalogija. Sacyjalogija. Jekanomika. Prava. 2006;3:50–55. Russian.
  28. Pariser E. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin UK; 2011. 304 р. Russian edition: Pariser E. Za stenoi fil’trov. Chto Internet skryvaet ot vas? Shirikov A, translator. Moscow: Al’pina Biznes Buks; 2012. 304 p.
  29. McNamee R. How to fix Facebook – before it fixes us [Internet]. Washington Monthly. 2018 [cited 31 November 2021]. Available from: https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/january-february-march-2018/how-to-fix-facebook-before-itfixes-us/.
  30. Tufekci Z, Wilson C. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir square. Journal of Communication. 2021;62(2):363–379.
Published
2022-03-10
Keywords: social capital, society, institutions, values, norms, traditions, trust, cooperation, solidarity, cohesion
How to Cite
Dedolko, J. V. (2022). Axiological status of social capital in the structure of intangible resources of contemporary society. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 49-58. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/4373