Reconstruction of the logical and communicative argumentation model

  • Oksana A. Vashko Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

Abstract

In the article is provided a systematic analysis of the essence of multidimensional phenomenon of argumentation as a logical-communicative model, is substantiated the significance of its logical and communicative components. Based on the analysis, the author identifies ethical-psychological, rhetorical and general methodological components in the communicative level of argumentation. There is offered conventional classification of the optimisation methods of argumentation procedure, used tricks and occurred errors in case of violation of logical rules the conducting an argument under the given components. Based on scientific and educational literature the main techniques, tricks and errors of argumentation are identified, listed and characterised. The provided material will be useful and practically applicable for specialists in the fields of administration, business, management, economics, politics, law, communications and many others, as well as in lecturing logic, argumentation theory and business communication for students and future professionals.

Author Biography

Oksana A. Vashko, Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

PhD (philosophy), docent; associate professor at the department of philosophy, Institute of Social Science and Humanities Education

References

  1. Ivlev YuV. Logika dlya yuristov [Logic for lawyers]. Moscow: Delo; 2003. 264 p. Russian.
  2. Berkov VF. [Argumentation and question]. Vesnik Belaruskaga dzjarzhawnaga universitjeta. Seryja 3. Gistoryja. Filasofija. Palitalogija. Sacyjalogija. Jekanomika. Prava. 1992;3:25–29. Russian.
  3. Mikhalkin NV. Logika i argumentatsiya dlya yuristov [Logic and argumentation for lawyers]. Moscow: Yurait; 2011. 363 p. Russian.
  4. Savchuk TN. Argumentatsiya v diskurse gumanitarnykh nauk (na materiale russko- i belorusskoyazychnykh tekstov) [Argumentation in the discourse of the humanities (based on the material of Russian and Belarusian texts)]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2019. 343 р. Russian.
  5. Ivlev YuV, Novoselov MM, Bergman AS. Argumentation. Humanitarian portal: concepts [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 February 14]. Аvailable from: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/7226. Russian.
  6. Kotelnikova LA, Ruzavin GI. [A systematic approach to the process of persuasion and argumentation]. In: Gerasimova IA, editor. Teoriya i praktika argumentatsii [Theory and practice of argumentation]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2001. р. 7–27. Russian.
  7. Podkopaeva EP. [Argumentation in the structure of rhetorical communication]. In: Sbornik rabot 60-i nauchnoi konferentsii studentov i aspirantov BGU. Chast’ 3; 14–16 maya 2003 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Collection of papers from the 60th scientific conference of Belarusian State University students and postgraduate students. Part 3; 2003 May 14–16; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2003. р. 217–220. Russian.
  8. Slizanova OG. [Argumentation as a structural component of rhetorical communication]. In: Sbornik rabot 62-i nauchnoi konferentsii studentov i aspirantov BGU. Chast’ 2; 17–20 maya 2005 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Collection of papers from the 62nd scientific conference of undergraduate and graduate students of Belarusian State University. Part 2; 2005 May 17–20; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2005. p. 225–229. Russian.
  9. Malykhina GI. Logika [Logic]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola; 2021. 384 p. Russian.
  10. Povarnin SI. Dispute: on the theory and practice of dispute [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2022 February 15]. Аvailable from: https://stavroskrest.ru/sites/default/files/files/books/povarnin_spor.pdf. Russian.
  11. Trushko MN. Logika [Logic]. Minsk: Belarus State Economic University; 2004. 131 p. Russian.
  12. Getmanova AD. Logika dlya yuristov [Logic for lawyers]. Moscow: Omega-L; 2005. 424 p. Russian.
  13. Berkov VF. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki [Philosophy and methodology of science]. Moscow: Novoe Znanie; 2004. 336 p. Russian.
Published
2022-09-28
Keywords: argumentation, logical-communicative model of argumentation, logical techniques of argumentation, rhetorical methods of argumentation, psychological and ethical methods of argumentation, general methodological tools of argumentation, logical errors, logical tricks, optimisation of argumentation
How to Cite
Vashko, O. A. (2022). Reconstruction of the logical and communicative argumentation model. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 76-82. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/4639
Issue
No 3 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology
Section
Social Researches

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)