The construct of rigidity in the concept of cognitive-personal development

  • Anzhela N. Pevneva Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 22 E. Ažeška Street, Hrodna 230023, Belarus

Abstract

The article is aimed at presenting a theoretical model of the development of rigidity as a construct based on the provisions of the concept of cognitive-personal development within the framework of general psychology. This concept served as the basis of the theoretical research, integrating the laws of the lines of cognitive and personal development. Using a group of scientific methods, in particular, the inductive-deductive and retrospective methods, as well as methods of theoretical design, modelling and forecasting, an analysis of the relationship between the two (cognitive and personal) lines of cognition has been performed. The aspects of the development of flexibility-rigidity, as a cognitive-personal construct, which is the natural result of the process of cognition, such as reflexivity (spontaneity (reactivity) and delay (inhibition)), coordination (system 1 and system 2), organisation (divergence and convergence) and regulativity (flexibility and control) have been revealed. Based on the provisions of the concept of cognitive-personal development, the construct of rigidity is presented as a qualitatively specific process of functioning of cognitive structures and personal properties. It is closely connected with the understanding of the relative autonomy of cognitive and personal (social) development, the primacy of the formation and leading role of cognitive mechanisms of cognition in relation to personal ones, as well as the conditionality of the ratio of cognitive and personal lines of development and the need for adaptation. The results of the theoretical study expand and supplement the available data on the problem of rigidity, which will form a continuum (ambivalent) view of the nature of the phenomenon under study and expand the vector of directions of its study in the field of general psychology.

Author Biography

Anzhela N. Pevneva, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 22 E. Ažeška Street, Hrodna 230023, Belarus

PhD (psychology), docent; head of the department of general and social psychology, faculty of psychology

References

  1. Lobanov AP. Psikhologiya intellekta i kognitivnykh stilei [Psychology of intelligence and cognitive styles]. Minsk: Agentstvo Vladimira Grevtsova; 2008. 296 p. Russian.
  2. Vilenskaya GA, Sergienko EA. [Social and cognitive development in early life]. In: Brushlinskii AV, Sergienko EA, editors. Mental’naya reprezentatsiya: dinamika i struktura [Mental representation: dynamics and structure]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1998. р. 199–216. Russian.
  3. Piaget J. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological works]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnaya pedagogicheskaya akademiya; 1994. 680 p. Russian.
  4. Piaget J. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Psikhologiya intellekta. Genezis chisla u rebenka. Logika i psikhologiya [Selected psychological works. Psychology of intelligence. The genesis of number in the child. Logic and psychology]. Sadovskii VN, Yudin EG, editors, compilers. Moscow: Prosveshchenie; 1969. 659 p. Russian.
  5. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;42(1):116–131. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116.
  6. Sechenov IM. Elementy mysli [Elements of mind]. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2001. 416 с.
  7. Kol’tsova VA, Zhdan AN. I. M. Sechenov’s theory «reflexes of the brain»: manifest of Russian objective psychology. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2015;36(2):70–77. Russian.
  8. Stepanov AI. Psychological connotations of temporal leaps: from book culture to modern culture. Mir psikhologii. 2011;2:222–228. Russian.
  9. McLuhan HM. Galaktika Gutenberga: stanovlenie cheloveka pechatayushchego [Gutenberg‘s galaxy: becoming a typing man]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2005. 496 p. Russian.
  10. McLuhan HM. Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding media: the external extensions of man]. Nikolaev V, translator. Moscow: Kanon-Press-Ts; 2003. 464 p. Russian.
  11. Guilford JP. Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist. 1959;14(8):469–479. DOI: 10.1037/h0046827.
  12. Halpern D. Psikhologiya kriticheskogo myshleniya [The Psychology of critical thinking]. Malygin N, Rysev S, Tsaruk L, translators. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2000. 505 p. Russian.
  13. Godefroid J. Chto takoe psikhologiya. Tom 1 [What is Psychology. Volume 1]. Alipov NN, Pegelau AV, Estrina TYa, translators. Moscow: Mir; 1996. 496 p. Russian.
  14. Kholodnaya MA. Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual’nogo uma [Cognitive styles. On the nature of the individual mind]. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2004. 384 p. Russian.
  15. Rokeach M. The open and closed mind: investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York: Basic Books; 1960. 447 p.
  16. Rusalov VM. Temperament v strukture individual’nosti cheloveka: differentsial’no-psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Temperament in the structure of human individuality: differential-psychophysiological and psychological research]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2012. 528 p. Russian.
  17. Kaneman D. Dumai medlenno… reshai bystro [Think slow... decide fast]. Moscow: AST; 2021. 653 p. Russian.
  18. Velichkovskii BM. Kognitivnaya nauka: osnovy psikhologii poznaniya. Tom 1 [Cognitive science: fundamentals of the psychology of cognition. Volume 1]. Moscow: Smysl; 2006. 448 р.
  19. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1973. 253 p. Russian edition: Kahneman D. Vnimanie i usilie. Gusev AN, editor. Moscow: Smysl; 2006. 287 p. Russian.
  20. Osavolyuk EYu, Kurginyan SS. Person’s cognitive flexibility: theory, measurement, and practice. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2018;15(1):128–144. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2018-1-128-144.
  21. Spiro RJ, Jehng JC. Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In: Nix D, Spiro RJ, editors. Cognition, education, and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1990. р. 163–205.
  22. Portoghese I, Lasio M, Conti R, Mascia ML, Hitchcott P, Agus M, et al. Cognitive flexibility inventory: factor structure, invariance, reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity among Italian university students. PsyCh Journal. 2020;9(6):934–941. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.401.
  23. Dennis JP, Vander Wal JS. The cognitive flexibility inventory: instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2010;34:241–253. DOI: 10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4.
Published
2023-05-25
Keywords: rigidity, construct, cognitive-personal development
Supporting Agencies The author grateful to the doctor of sciences (psychology), professor A. P. Lobanov for the professional support of the research manuscript, assistance in the construction and substantiation of the theoretical model of rigidity, as well as support in the implementation of the main goal and objectives during the article writing.
How to Cite
Pevneva, A. N. (2023). The construct of rigidity in the concept of cognitive-personal development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 84-92. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/5311