Heuristic potentiality and applicability limits of the anthropic principle

  • Elizaveta V. Savlukova Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Irina A. Barsuk Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The article examines the anthropic principle in modern scientific knowledge, demonstrates its interpretations, shows its heuristic potential, and substantiates the limits of applicability in post-non-classical science. It is revealed that the philosophical, ideological and methodological foundations of the anthropic principle acquire the status of a universal construct in the formation of the modern scientific picture of the world. It is substantiated why the anthropic principle allows theoretically solving a number of fundamental issues of modern astrophysics and cosmology. The interrelation of the concept of global evolutionism with socio-humanitarian and natural science cognition is presented representatively.

Author Biographies

Elizaveta V. Savlukova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

 

Irina A. Barsuk, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (philosophy), docent; head of the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

 

References

  1. Gindilis LM. O sovremennom statuse idei global’nogo ehvolyutsionizma [On the current status of the idea of global evolutionism]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR; 1986. [The anthropic principle and Bruno’s principle]; p. 158–163. Russian.
  2. Stepin VS, Gorokhov VG, Rozov MA. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of science and technology]. Moscow: Gardariki; 1999. 400 p. Russian.
  3. Carter B. Kosmologiya. Teoriya i nablyudeniya [Cosmology. Theory and observations]. Moscow: Mir; 1978. [Coincidence of large numbers and the anthropological principle in cosmology]; p. 369–379. Russian.
  4. Idlis GM. Revolyutsii v astronomii, fizike i kosmologii [Revolutions in astronomy, physics and cosmology]. Moscow: Nauka; 1985. 232 p. Russian.
  5. Kazyutinskii VV, Balashov YuV. [Anthropic principle. History and modernity]. Priroda. 1989;1:23–32. Russian.
  6. Voytsehovich VE. Anthropic principle as an integrant core of post-non-classical science. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2010;9:33–37. Russian.
  7. Stepin VS. Nauchnoe poznanie v sotsial’nom kontekste. Izbrannye trudy [Scientific knowledge in a social context. Selected works]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2012. 416 p. Russian.
  8. Zel’manov AL. [Towards the formulation of the cosmological problem]. In: Trudy Vtorogo s’ezda Vsesoyuznogo astronomo-geodezicheskogo obshchestva [Proceedings of the Second congress of the All-union astronomical and geodetic society]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR; 1960. p. 72–84. Russian.
  9. Vodopyanov PA. [Priorities of noospheric education and its role in the implementation of sustainable development]. Trudy BGTU. Seriya 5, Politologiya, filosofiya, istoriya, filologiya. 2008;5:75–78. Russian.
Published
2024-01-26
Keywords: anthropic principle, virtualistics, philosophy, cosmology, post-non-classical science, global evolutionism
How to Cite
Savlukova, E. V., & Barsuk, I. A. (2024). Heuristic potentiality and applicability limits of the anthropic principle. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 75-83. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/5431