The formation of a pragma-dialectical model of reasonableness as the basis of rationality

  • Anna V. Sarycheva Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The article carries out a historical and philosophical reconstruction of the three stages of formation of the pragma-dialectical model of reasonableness as the basis of rationality, and identifies and explicates the dominant criteria of reasonableness at each stage. The specificity of each stage of reasonableness modelling – geometrical, anthropological and critical – is explained. Geometrical modelling of reasonableness is revealed in correlation with the classical type of rationality, characterised by the prevalence of formal criteria of reasonableness in the study of simple systems, anthropological modelling – in correlation with the non-classical type of rationality, characterised by the prevalence of criteria reflecting the value-purpose aspects in self-regulating systems. Critical modelling of reasonableness is revealed within the framework of post-non-classical rationality and synergetic methodology, which makes possible the synthesis of formal and anthropological criteria of reasonableness as applied to the conditions of self-developing systems.

Author Biography

Anna V. Sarycheva, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Plato. Sobranie sochinenii. Tom 1 [Collected Works. Volume 1]. Markisha SP, translator; Losev AF, Asmus VF, editors. Moscow: Mysl’; 1990. [Gorgias]; p. 477–574. Russian.
  2. Plato. Sobranie sochinenii. Tom 2 [Collected Works. Volume 2]. Markisha SP, translator; Losev AF, Asmus VF, editors. Moscow: Mysl’; 1993. [Phaedrus]; p. 135–191. Russian.
  3. Aristotle. [Rhetoric]. In: Platonova N, translator; Taho-Godi AA, editor. Antichnye ritoriki [Antique Rhetoricians]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta; 1978. p. 15–166. Russian. (Universitetskaya biblioteka).
  4. Aristotle. Sochineniya. Tom 2 [Works. Volume 2]. Mikeladze ZN, editor. Moscow: Mysl’; 1978. [Topica]; p. 347–532. Russian.
  5. Pascal B. [On the geometrical mind and the art of persuasion]. In: Strel’tsova GYa, editor. Paskal’ i evropeiskaya kul’tura [Pascal and European culture]. Moscow: Respublika; 1994. p. 453–456. Russian.
  6. Toulmin S. Knowing and action an invitation to philosophy. London: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1976. 310 p.
  7. Perelman Ch, Olbrechts-Tyteca L. The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation. Indiana: University of Notre Dаme Press; 1971. 576 р.
  8. van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 224 p.
  9. Stepin VS. [Classics, non-classics, post-non-classics: criteria of distinction]. In: Kiyashchenko LP, editor. Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Post-non-classics: philosophy, science, culture]. Saint Petersburg: Mir; 2009. p. 249–295. Russian.
  10. Vorob’eva SV. [Configurations of Ethos in the concepts of rhetorical communication by E. Levinas and H. Perelman]. In: Bendin AYu, editor. Kirillo-Mefodievskie chteniya, posvyashchennye Dnyam slavyanskoi pis’mennosti i kul’tury. Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. Chast’ 1. Kniga 2; 22–24 maya 2002 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Cyril and Methodius readings devoted to the Days of Slavic writing and culture. Proceedings of the 7 th International conference. Part 1, book 2; 2002 May 22–24; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Kovcheg; 2002. p. 243–251. Russian.
  11. Popper KR. [What is dialectics?]. Novichkova GA, translator. Voprosy filosofii. 1995;1:118–138. Russian.
  12. Albert H. Traktat o kriticheskom razume [A treatise on the critical mind]. Shishkova IZ, translator. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 2003. 264 р. Russian.
  13. Vorob’eva SV. Critical thinking: interaction of logic, epistemological and cognitive factors. The Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences. 2015;1:67–71. Russian.
Published
2023-10-31
Keywords: geometrical modelling of reasonableness, anthropological modelling of reasonableness, critical thinking, pragma-dialectical model of reasonableness, self-developing systems, post-non-classical rationality
How to Cite
Sarycheva, A. V. (2023). The formation of a pragma-dialectical model of reasonableness as the basis of rationality. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 20-25. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/5506
Issue
No 3 (2023): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology
Section
History of Philosophy

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)