Experimental methodology of socio-humanitarian knowledge: epistemological aspect
Abstract
The stages of formation and development of experimental methodology in the social sciences are discussed in the article. An interdisciplinary experiment is characterised as a type of research activity based on the integration of the methods of disciplinary science in the study of complex problems of nature and society. In social epistemology, the significance of an interdisciplinary experiment lies in its connection with social demand, the possibility of obtaining effective knowledge. Cultural and historical epistemology focuses on the interdisciplinary experiment as a process of scientific research, on the experimenting consciousness of scientists. The heuristic nature of the interdisciplinary experiment, its prognostic potential and the ability to reveal the unknown are emphasised, which is of particular importance for understanding the features of social and humanitarian cognition in modern society.
References
- Durkheim E. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. Gofman AB, translator, compiler. Moscow: Kanon; 1995. 352 p. Russian.
- Saiganova VS. [Epistemological significance of an interdisciplinary experiment in social and humanitarian knowledge]. In: Shchedrina TG, Pruzhinin BI, editors. Kto v nauke Sherlok Holms? Paradoksi eksperimentiruyushchego soznaniya [Who is Sherlock Holmes in science? Paradoxes of experimental consciousness]. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; 2022. p. 239–247. Russian.
- Gavrilina EA. An experiment in socio-humanitarian cognition: genesis and evolution. Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2017;1:30–45. Russian. DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2017-22-1-30-45.
- Voznyakevich EE. [Transdisciplinarity and the phenomenon of implicit knowledge]. In: Gusakov VG, Kovalenya AA, Gigin VF, Zelenkov AI, Lazarevich AA, Chueshov VI, et al., editors. Natsional’naya filosofiya v global’nom mire. Tezisy Pervogo belorusskogo filosofskogo kongressa; 18–20 oktyabrya 2017 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [National philosophy in the global world. Thesis of the First Belarusian philosophical congress; 2017 October 18–20; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2017. p. 101–102. Russian.
- Kroes P. Experiments on socio-technical systems: the problem of control. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2016;22(3):633–645.
- Saiganova VS. Historical epistemology: origin and current state. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy. Psychology. 2020;3:26–30. Russian.
- Kasavin IT. [Social epistemology]. In: Kasavin IT, editor. Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Mosсow: Kanon+; 2009. p. 908–909. Russian.
- Shipovalova LV. [On the possibility of compatibility of historicity and objectivity of scientific knowledge]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. 2012;4:19–23. Russian.
- Pruzhinin BI. Knowledge as a value: an essay on cultural-historical epistemology. Humanities Research in the Russian Far East. 2014;1:135–141. Russian.
- Mikeshina LA. [Thought experiment, its role in historical science]. Dialog so vremenem. 2018;65:35–47. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)