Experimental methodology of socio-humanitarian knowledge: epistemological aspect

  • Veronika S. Saiganova Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The stages of formation and development of experimental methodology in the social sciences are discussed in the article. An interdisciplinary experiment is characterised as a type of research activity based on the integration of the methods of disciplinary science in the study of complex problems of nature and society. In social epistemology, the significance of an interdisciplinary experiment lies in its connection with social demand, the possibility of obtaining effective knowledge. Cultural and historical epistemology focuses on the interdisciplinary experiment as a process of scientific research, on the experimenting consciousness of scientists. The heuristic nature of the interdisciplinary experiment, its prognostic potential and the ability to reveal the unknown are emphasised, which is of particular importance for understanding the features of social and humanitarian cognition in modern society.

Author Biography

Veronika S. Saiganova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (philosophy), docent; dean of the faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Durkheim E. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. Gofman AB, translator, compiler. Moscow: Kanon; 1995. 352 p. Russian.
  2. Saiganova VS. [Epistemological significance of an interdisciplinary experiment in social and humanitarian knowledge]. In: Shchedrina TG, Pruzhinin BI, editors. Kto v nauke Sherlok Holms? Paradoksi eksperimentiruyushchego soznaniya [Who is Sherlock Holmes in science? Paradoxes of experimental consciousness]. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; 2022. p. 239–247. Russian.
  3. Gavrilina EA. An experiment in socio-humanitarian cognition: genesis and evolution. Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2017;1:30–45. Russian. DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2017-22-1-30-45.
  4. Voznyakevich EE. [Transdisciplinarity and the phenomenon of implicit knowledge]. In: Gusakov VG, Kovalenya AA, Gigin VF, Zelenkov AI, Lazarevich AA, Chueshov VI, et al., editors. Natsional’naya filosofiya v global’nom mire. Tezisy Pervogo belorusskogo filosofskogo kongressa; 18–20 oktyabrya 2017 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [National philosophy in the global world. Thesis of the First Belarusian philosophical congress; 2017 October 18–20; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2017. p. 101–102. Russian.
  5. Kroes P. Experiments on socio-technical systems: the problem of control. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2016;22(3):633–645.
  6. Saiganova VS. Historical epistemology: origin and current state. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy. Psychology. 2020;3:26–30. Russian.
  7. Kasavin IT. [Social epistemology]. In: Kasavin IT, editor. Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Mosсow: Kanon+; 2009. p. 908–909. Russian.
  8. Shipovalova LV. [On the possibility of compatibility of historicity and objectivity of scientific knowledge]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. 2012;4:19–23. Russian.
  9. Pruzhinin BI. Knowledge as a value: an essay on cultural-historical epistemology. Humanities Research in the Russian Far East. 2014;1:135–141. Russian.
  10. Mikeshina LA. [Thought experiment, its role in historical science]. Dialog so vremenem. 2018;65:35–47. Russian.
Published
2023-05-29
Keywords: cultural and historical epistemology, interdisciplinary experiment, postnonclassical epistemology, social epistemology, social and humanitarian knowledge, sociotechnical experiment
How to Cite
Saiganova, V. S. (2023). Experimental methodology of socio-humanitarian knowledge: epistemological aspect. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 46-51. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/5673