Hierarchy of motives and structure of motivation for the use of electronic social networks by students

  • Ivan V. Tkachov Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The peculiarities of the hierarchy of motives and the structure of motivation for the use of electronic social networks (ESN) by students depending on their gender, age and level of communicative competency have been determined. It was found that women, in comparison with men, give priority to the motives «social connectedness», «follower and observation of others» and «self-expression»; the structure of their motivation is more organised than the structure of men’s motivation for the use of ESS. It is indicated that in the hierarchy of motives for the use of these media platforms by students 17–19 years old, in contrast to the hierarchy of motives, typical of students 20–25 years old, the motives «self-expression» and «new friendships» are placed on different levels; instrumental motives instrumental motives («academic purposes» and «information») have a greater weight in the structure of motivation of the younger group representatives’ appeal to ESN than in this structure of motivation, belonging to the older group of respondents; the motive «self-expression» plays a greater role in the structure of motivation for the use of ESS by students 20–25 years old. It was revealed that the motives «entertainment» and «social connectedness» occupy a higher position in the hierarchy of motives for the use of ESN, characteristic of students with a low level of communicative competency, than for students with its medium and high levels. It has been noted that the structure of motivation for the use of these media platforms by students with high indicators of communicative competency is less organised, i. e. the use of ESN by these respondents is more differentiated.

Author Biography

Ivan V. Tkachov, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of social and organisational psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Ткачёв ИВ, Фофанова ГА. Адаптация опросника «Мотивы использования электронных социальных сетей» на выборке белорусских студентов. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология. 2023;1:82–94.
  2. Ellison NB, Boyd DM. Sociality through social network sites. In: Dutton WH, editor. The Oxford handbook of Internet studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 151–172. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008.
  3. Katz E, Blumler JG, Gurevitch M. Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1973;4:509–523. DOI: 10.1086/268109.
  4. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self­determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford publications; 2017. 756 p.
  5. Wang Xuequn, Li Yibai. Users’ satisfaction with social network sites: a self-determination perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2016;1:48–54. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2015.11645800.
  6. Xiao Qian, Zhuang Weiling, Hsu MK. Using social networking sites: what is the big attraction? Exploring a mediated moderation relationship. Journal of Internet Commerce. 2014;1:45–64. DOI: 10.1080/15332861.2014.898441.
  7. Ткачёв ИВ. Компонентный состав коммуникативной компетентности и ее измерение. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология. 2022;2:85–92.
  8. Hodis GM, Hodis FA. Examining motivation predictors of key communication constructs: an investigation of regulatory focus, need satisfaction, and need frustration. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;2:110985. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110985.
  9. McKenna K, Bargh JA. Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2000;1:57–75. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6.
  10. Kraut RE, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J, Helgeson V, Crawford A. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues. 2002;1:49–74. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00248.
  11. Наследов АД, Семенов ВЮ. Модификация шкалы социального интеллекта tromsø для российских школьников. Вестник Санкт­Петербургского университета. Социология. 2015;4:5–21.
  12. Люсин ДВ. Опросник на эмоциональный интеллект «ЭмИн»: новые психометрические данные. В: Люсин ДВ, Ушаков ДВ, редакторы. Социальный и эмоциональный интеллект: от процессов к измерениям. Москва: Институт психологии РАН; 2009. c. 264–278.
  13. Магомед-Эминов МШ. Мотивация достижения: структура и механизмы [диссертация]. Москва: Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова; 1987. 343 c.
  14. Faye C, Sharpe D. Academic motivation in university: the role of basic psychological needs and identity formation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 2008;4:189–199. DOI: 10.1037/a0012858.
  15. Masur PK, Reinecke L, Ziegele M, Quiring O. The interplay of intrinsic need satisfaction and Facebook specific motives in explaining addictive behavior on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;39:376–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.047.
  16. Карпов АА. Общие способности в структуре метакогнитивных качеств личности. Ярославль: Ярославский государственный университет; 2014. 272 с.
  17. Archer J. The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2019;4:1381–1415. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12507.
  18. Hunt M, All K, Burns B, Li K. Too much of a good thing: who we follow, what we do, and how much time we spend on social media affects well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2021;1:46–68. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2021.40.1.46.
  19. Vogel EA, Rose JP, Roberts L, Eckles K. Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2014;4:206–222. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000047.
  20. Cheung Ting Ting. A study on motives, usage, self-presentation and number of followers on Instagram. Outstanding Academic Papers by Students of the City University of Hong Kong [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 January 11]. Available from: http://dspace.cityu.edu.hk/bitstream/2031/7521/1/fulltext.html.
  21. Горбушина ЕА. Особенности самопрезентации в социальных сетях с учетом половых различий. Психологические исследования. 2023;4:2. DOI: 10.54359/ps.v16i90.1434.
  22. Wang Xuequn, Li Yibai. How trust and need satisfaction motivate producing user-generated content. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2017;1:49–57. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1181493.
Published
2025-03-18
Keywords: motives for the use of electronic social networks, communication competency, hierarchy of motives, motivation structure, students
How to Cite
Tkachov, I. V. (2025). Hierarchy of motives and structure of motivation for the use of electronic social networks by students. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 44-54. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/6904
Issue
No 1 (2025): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology
Section
Psychological Researches

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)