Cross-cultural bases of tendencies of civilization development

  • Svetlana V. Vorobyova Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Anatolii A. Liahchylin Belarusian State UniversiBelarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarusty

Abstract

The main trends in the reconstruction of cross-cultural bases of tendencies of civilizational development are
systematized. The methodological significance of the cultural-centric paradigm and the duality principle is revealed. The conditions of cross-cultural modeling of civilizational identity in the context of ontological and epistemological orthogonal factors are determined. The specifics of constructive interpretations of the cultural continuum are explained. The ways of substantiating the formal properties of tendencies of civilizational development are outlined: the search for relevant conditions; differentiation of ontological situations as states and processes.

Author Biographies

Svetlana V. Vorobyova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (philosophy); associate professor at the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social science

Anatolii A. Liahchylin, Belarusian State UniversiBelarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarusty

PhD (philosophy), docent; head of the department of philosophy of culture, faculty of philosophy and social science

References

  1. Buzgalin A. V. Civilization Approach and Failures of Marxism: man and culture. Vopr. filos. [Issues Philos.]. 2014. No. 11. P. 3–13 (in Russ.).
  2. Kolganov A. I. Civilization approach and white spots of Marxism: East, West and market as a universal value. Vopr. filos. [Issues Philos.]. 2014. No. 11. P. 14–24 (in Russ.).
  3. Glinchikova A. G. [Transformations in modern civilization: post-industrial and posteconomic society (materials of the round table)]. Vopr. filos. [Issues Philos.]. 2000. No. 1. P. 3–32 (in Russ.).
  4. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya [The Future Post-Industrial Society. Experience of social forecasting]. Moscow : Academia, 1999 (in Russ.).
  5. Toffler A. The Third Wave: The Classic Study of to Tomorrow. New York : Morrow, 1980. Russ. ed.: Toffler A. Tret’ya volna. Moscow : AST, 2004 (in Russ.).
  6. Wallerstein I. Analiz mirovykh sistem i situatsiya v sovremennom mire [Analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world]. Saint Petersburg : Univ. Book, 2001 (in Russ.).
  7. Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations and remarking of world order. New York : Simon and Schuster, 1986. Russ. ed.: Hantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii. Moscow : AST, 2003 (in Russ.).
  8. Wallerstein I. The end of the world as we know it. Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis ; London : Univ. Minn. Press, 1999. Russ. ed.: Wallerstein I. Konets znakomogo mira. Sotsiologiya XXI veka. Moscow : Logos, 2004 (in Russ.).
  9. Berger P. L. The Cultural Dynamics of Globalization. In: Many globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the contemporary
  10. world. Oxford, 2002. Russ. ed.: Berger P. L. Kul’turnaya dinamika globalizatsii. In: Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya. Moscow, 2004. P. 8–26 (in Russ.).
  11. Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. New York : Macmillan, 1992. Russ. ed.: Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek. Moscow : AST, 2004 (in Russ.).
  12. Derrida J. Liber té au present: La démocratie a journée. In: Le Monde de la Révolution Francaise. Paris, 1989. P. 19–55 (in Fr.).
  13. Derrida J. La Raison du plus fort (Y-t-il des etats voyous). In: Voyous. Deuxessais sur la raison. Paris, 2003. P. 9–161 (in Fr.).
  14. Giddens A. Ustroenie obshchestva: ocherk teorii strukturatsii [The organization of society: An outline of the theory of structure]. Moscow : Acad. Project, 2005 (in Russ.).
  15. Bourdieu P. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo: polya i praktiki [Social space: fields and practices]. Moscow ; Saint Petersburg : Inst. Experimental Soc. : Aleteya, 2005 (in Russ.).
  16. Elias N. Über den Prozess der Zivilisation : in 2 band. Basel : Verlag Haus zum Falken, 1939. Band. 1 : Soziogenetische und psychogenetische untersuchungen [Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den welitichen Oberschichten des Abendlandes]. Russ. ed.: Elias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii : in 2 books. Moscow ; Saint Petersburg : Univ. Book, 2001. Book 1 : Sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya (in Russ.).
  17. Legchilin A. A. [Dialogue of Cultures in the Context of a Globalizing World]. Filosofiya i ratsional’nost’ v kul’ture globaliziruyushchegosya mira [Philosophy and rationality in the culture of the globalizing world] : mater. of Int. sci. conf. (Minsk, 22–23 Oct., 2009). Minsk, 2009. P. 56–59 (in Russ.).
  18. Vasyukov V. L. [Consequences of logical pluralism: global and local aspects]. Logicheskie issled. [Log. Res.]. 2003. Issue 10. P. 23–34 (in Russ.).
  19. Shalak V. I. [Multivalued weak relevant RS (relevant scaled)]. Logicheskie issled. [Log. Res.]. 2003. Issue 10. P. 212–217 (in Russ.).
  20. Bystrov P. N. [Relevant systems with global rules of inference]. Logicheskie issled. [Log. Res.]. 1996. Issue 2. P. 139–152 (in Russ.).
  21. Zaitsev D. V. [Theory of the relevant sequence III: combinatorial semantics TE]. Logicheskie issled. [Log. Res.]. 2001. Issue 8. P. 38–49 (in Russ.).
  22. Tyaglo A. V., Voropay T. S. Kriticheskoe myshlenie: problema mirovogo obrazovaniya XXI veka [Critical Thinking: The Problem of World Education in the 21st Century The tax]. Kharkiv : Univ. int. Affairs, 1999 (in Russ.).
  23. Bauman Z. Liquid modernity. Cambridge : Polity press, 2000. Russ. ed.: Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’. Saint Petersburg : Piter, 2008 (in Russ.).
  24. Levinas E. Totalitéetinfini. Essai sur L’Extériorité. Dordrecht : Kluwer Acad., 1991 (in Fr.).
  25. Lévinas E. Diachronie et représentation. Rev. l’Univ. Ottava. 1985. Vol. 55. P. 85–98 (in Fr.).
Published
2019-01-17
Keywords: cross-cultural grounds, cultural-centric paradigm, duality principle, civilizational identity, cultural continuum, constructive continuum, relevance, conditions, processes
How to Cite
Vorobyova, S. V., & Liahchylin, A. A. (2019). Cross-cultural bases of tendencies of civilization development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 17-22. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/1973
Issue
No 2 (2018): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology
Section
1st Belarusian Congress of Philosophy "National Philosophy in the Global World"

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)