Modeling of the straw tube tracker for the COMET experiment
Abstract
In the present paper a parametric model of a straw tracker is implemented on the basis of technical design report of the COMET experiment within the Geant4 toolkit. This model allows one to smoothly tailor both the diameter and width of the film and to vary the gas mixture. In order to investigate the response of the straw detector to the propogation of the charged particles, a «physical sheet» corresponging to the COMET conditions (i. e. a set of all possible processes for all participating particles defining the interaction in the Geant4) is created. We show that it is impossible to reach high accuracy in identification of the particles solely on the basis of the data obtained within the straw tracker because, depending on the threshold energy, false identification is liable when a muon or pion is treated as an electron. The optimum mixture of gases for the straw tracker within the conditions of the Phase-II of the COMET experiment is obtained on the basis of Monte-Carlo modeling for the propagation of charged particles (electrons, pions and muons) with 105 MeV/c momentum through a system of 5 straw modules. It is shown that, as regards the momentum reconstruction error, the mixture He – C2H6 is an optimum mixture of gases among all the candidates possible (Ar – C2H6, He – C2H6, Xe – C2H6 in the proportion 50 : 50).
References
- Emel’yanov V. M. Standartnaya model’ i ee rasshireniya. Moscow, 2007 (in Russ.).
- Aad G., Abajyan T., Abbott B., et al. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. Vol. 716, No. 1. P. 1–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020.
- Chatrchyan S., Khachatryan V., Sirunyan A. M., et al. Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. Vol. 716, No. 1. P. 30 – 61. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021.
- Adam J., Bai X., Baldini A. M., et al. New Limit on the Lepton-Flavor-Violating Decay µg ++ → e. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011. Vol. 107, issue 17. P. 171801. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.171801.
- Bellgart U., Otter G., Eichler R., et al. Search for the decay µ++ +-→ eee. Nucl. Phys. B. 1988. Vol. 299, issue 1. P. 1– 6. DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90462-2.
- Dohmen C., Groth K.-D., Heer B., et al. Test of lepton-flavour conservation in µ→e conversion on titanium. Phys. Lett. B. 1993. Vol. 317, issue 4. P. 631– 636. DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91383-X.
- Kuno Y. A search for muon-to-electron conversion at J-PARC: the COMET experiment. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013. Vol. 2013, No. 2. P. 022C01.
- Agostinelli S., Allison J., Amako K., et al. Geant4 – a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2003. Vol. 506, No. 3. P. 250 –303.
- Comet Collaboration COMET Phase-I. Technical Des. Rep. 2016. URL: http://comet.kek.jp/Documents_files/PAC-TDR-2016/ COMET-TDR-2016_v2.pdf (date of access: 27.02.2017).
- Antcheva I., Ballintijn M., Bellenot B., et al. ROOT – a C+ + framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009. Vol. 180, issue 12. P. 2499 –2512. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.08.005.
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Physics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)