Reconsidering Giddens’ theory of structuration

  • Jiří Šubrt Charles University, 560/5 Ovocný trh, Prague 1, 11636, Czech

Abstract

This article deals with the theory of structuration of Anthony Giddens. It shows the main conceptual tools of his conception, its strengths and weaknesses, and how it might be possible to surpass its perspective. Giddens’ conception is based on trying to overcome the long-term theoretical dualism of individuals (individualism) and society (holism) with the help of the concept of duality of action and structure. The author of this article believes that overcoming this dualism would require a conception that does not translate it into «duality» (as Giddens’ does), but rather attempts to capture it in a «duplex» perspective. The inspiration for this is found in Emile Durkheim, and the author tries here to elaborate on it.

Author Biography

Jiří Šubrt, Charles University, 560/5 Ovocný trh, Prague 1, 11636, Czech

PhD (sociology), docent; head of the department of historical sociology, faculty of humanities

References

  1. Giddens A. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971.
  2. Giddens A. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson; 1976.
  3. Giddens A. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Volume 1. Power, Property and the State. London: Macmillan; 1981.
  4. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity; 1990.
  5. Giddens A. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity; 1998.
  6. Giddens A. Europe In The Global Age. Cambridge: Polity; 2007.
  7. Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1979.
  8. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984.
  9. Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Volume 1, 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1981.
  10. Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction. Social Analysis. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1979. p. 55.
  11. Giddens A. Time and Space in Social Theory. In: Matthes J, editor. Lebenswelt und soziale Probleme. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag; 1981. p. 88–97.
  12. Durkheim É. Dualismus lidské přirozenosti a její společenské podmínky. In: Cahiers du CEFRES. 1995;8:16–34. Czech.
  13. Joas H. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1992.
  14. Šubrt J. The Perspective of Historical sociology: The Individual as Homo-Sociologicus through Society and History. Bingley: Emerald; 2017.
  15. Šubrt J. Individualism, Holism and the Central Dilemma of Sociological Theory. Bingley: Emerald; 2019.
Published
2019-06-21
Keywords: sociological theory, theory of structuration, actor, action, interaction, structure, duality of action and structure, homo duplex
How to Cite
Šubrt, J. (2019). Reconsidering Giddens’ theory of structuration. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 1, 69-73. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/sociology/article/view/1768
Issue
No 1 (2019): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology
Section
Discussion

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)