«The creative turn» in European social theory

  • Iryna Ja. Matsevich-Dukhan Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-2371

Abstract

The article reveals specific features of contemporary European social theory within its turn to the nature of creative practices. Different socio-philosophical methods of their cognition are demonstrated. The explication of the character of European social theory as a whole outlines the increasing interest in the formation of a theory of creative society which critically grounds the set of political programmes «Creative Europe». The author defines the concept of the creative turn within a comparative analysis of those theories of contemporary society which explore the peculiarity of social reality constituting on the basis of creative economy. Its practices become a special subject matter of social theory revealing societal limitations of their fulfillment.

Author Biography

Iryna Ja. Matsevich-Dukhan, Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus

PhD (philosophy), docent; postdoctoral researcher

References

  1. Urry J. Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge; 2000. 255 p.
  2. Law J. After method: mess in social science research. London: Routledge; 2004. 188 p.
  3. Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. 301 p.
  4. Bruell C. Ifa-edition culture and foreign policy Creative Europe 2014–2020. A new programme – a new cultural policy as well? Stuttgart: Institute for Foreign Cultural Relations; 2013. 29 p.
  5. Dossi S. The creative Europe programme. European implementation assessment. Brussels: EPRS; 2016. 40 p.
  6. Matsevich-Dukhan I. Towards a creative society: European versus American approaches. Studies in Euroculture. 2020;5:115–139. DOI: 10.17875/gup2019-1225.
  7. Reckwitz A. Das Ende der Illusionen: Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur in der Spätmoderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp; 2019. 306 S.
  8. Reckwitz A. Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Zum Prozess gesellschaftlicher Ästhetisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp; 2012. 408 S.
  9. Reckwitz A. Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp; 2017. 480 S.
  10. Reckwitz A. Kreativität und soziale Praxis: Studien zur Sozial- und Gesellschaftstheorie. Bielefeld: Transcript; 2016. 314 S.
  11. Reckwitz A. The invention of creativity. Modern society and the culture of the new. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017. 310 p.
  12. Stasiulis N. The idea of the creative society and the development of creative industries. Economics and Sociology. 2017;10(2):217–226. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/16.
  13. Landry C. The creative city: a toolkit for urban innovators. London: Earthscan; 2006. 350 p.
  14. Parrish D. T-shirts and suits. A guide to the business of creativity. Liverpool: Merseyside ACME; 2006. 112 p.
  15. Ridderstrale J, Nordstrom KA. Funky business: talent makes capital dance. London: Prentice Hall; 2002. 288 p. Co-published by the «Financial Times».
  16. Florida R. The experiential life. In: Hartley J, editor. Creative industries. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. p. 133–147.
  17. Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge; 2007. 613 p.
  18. Wallas G. The Great Society. A psychological analysis. London: Macmillan and Co.; 1914. 406 p.
  19. Florida R. The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books; 2002. 404 p.
  20. Florida R. The new urban crisis: how our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class – and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books; 2017. 336 p.
  21. Galambos L. The creative society – and the price Americans paid for it. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 336 p.
  22. Glaeser E. Triumph of the city: How our best invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Press; 2011. 352 p.
  23. Matsevich-Dukhan IJa. In quest of a homeland of the wandering class. Voprosy Filosofii. 2020;1:66–76. DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-1-66-76.
  24. Moretti E. The new geography of jobs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2012. 304 p.
  25. Stern MJ, Seifert SC. From creative economy to creative society. Culture and community revitalisation: a collaboration [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2019 April 4]. Available from: http://repository.upenn.edu/siap_revitalization/6.
  26. Wiesand A, Söndermann M. The «creative sector» – an engine for diversity, growth and jobs in Europe. Amsterdam: European Cultural Foundation; 2005. 18 p.
  27. Howkins J. The creative economy: how people make money from ideas. London: Penguin Books; 2007. 269 p.
  28. Schoenwald J. Time for choosing: the rise of modern American conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. 352 p.
  29. Dewey J. Creative democracy – the task before us. In: Boydston JA, editor. John Dewey: the later works, 1925–1953. Volume 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 1988. p. 224–230.
  30. Bianchini F, Santacatterina LG, editors. Culture and neighbourhoods. Volume 2. A comparative report. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing; 1997. 110 p.
  31. Landry C. London as a creative city. In: Hartley J, editor. Creative industries. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008. p. 233–244.
  32. Landry C. The art of city making. London: Earthscan; 2008. 462 p.
  33. Habermas J. Theory of communication action. Boston: Beacon Press; 1984–1991. 2 volumes.
  34. Parsons T. The structure of social action. New York: McGraw Hill; 1937. 840 p.
  35. Weber M. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1978. 1840 p.
  36. Weber M. The nature of social action. In: Runciman WG, editor. Max Weber: selections in translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1978. p. 7–32. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511810831.005.
  37. Joas H. The creativity of action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996. 336 p.
  38. Joas H. Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. 280 p.
  39. Delanty G, editor. Handbook of contemporary European social theory. London: Routledge; 2006. 419 p.
  40. Joas H. Social theory: twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 618 p.
  41. Baert P, Turner BS. Pragmatism and European social theory. Oxford: Bardwell Press; 2007. 187 p.
  42. Boltanski L, Chiapello E. The new spirit of capitalism. London: VERSO; 2007. 601 p.
  43. Boltanski L, Thévenot L. On justification: economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2006. 400 p.
  44. Alexander JC. Action and its environments: toward a new synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press; 1988. 342 p.
  45. Bernstein RJ. Praxis and action: contemporary philosophies of human activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1971. 368 p.
  46. Putnam H. Pragmatism: an open question. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995. 120 p.
  47. Rorty R. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1979. 424 p.
  48. Dubuisson-Quellier S, Plessz M. Annexe 1: La théorie des pratiques, une recherche bibliographique. Sociologie [Internet]. 2013 [cité 4 avril 2019];4(4). Disponible à: http://sociologie.revues.org/2039.
  49. Schatzki TR. Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. 260 p.
  50. Knorr-Cetina K, Schatzki T, von Savigny E, editors. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge; 2001. 252 p.
  51. Reckwitz A. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorising. European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5(2):243–263. DOI: 10.1177/13684310222225432.
  52. Warde A. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture. 2005;5(2):131–153. DOI: 10.1177/ 1469540505053090.
  53. Ryan JM. Cutting-edge developments in contemporary theory. In: Ritzer G, editor. Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010. p. 645–664.
  54. Veblen T. The theory of the leisure class. London: Penguin Classics; 1994. 400 p.
  55. Nelson C. The invention of creativity: the emergence of a discourse. Cultural Studies Review. 2010;16(2):49–74. DOI: 10.5130/csr.v16i2.1694.
  56. Throsby D. Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. 208 p.
  57. Buckeridge R, Cutler T. Commerce in content: building Australia’s future in interactive multimedia markets. Melbourne: Cutler & Company; 1994. 45 p.
  58. Craik J. Re-visioning arts and cultural policy. Current impasses and future directions. Canberra: ANU E Press; 2007. 104 p.
  59. Higgs P, Cunningham S, Pagan J. Australia’s creative economy: definitions of the segments and sectors. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries & Innovation; 2007 [Internet; cited 2019 April 4]. Available from: http://eprints. qut.edu.au/archive/0008242/.
  60. Joas H. Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1999. 321 S.
  61. Garnham N. Concepts of culture: public policy and the cultural industries. Cultural Studies. 1987;1(1):23–37. DOI: 10.1080/09502388700490021.
  62. Garnham N. From the arts to the creative industries: anatomy of confusion. In: Selwood S, editor. The UK cultural sector: profile and policy issues. London: Policy Studies Institute; 2001. p. 445–459.
  63. Offe C. Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Social Research. 2004;71(3):501–528.
  64. Reckwitz A. The creativity dispositif and the social regimes of the new. In: Rammert W, Windeler A, Knoblauch H, Hutter M, editors. Innovation Society Today. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2018. p. 127–148.
Published
2021-07-02
Keywords: social theory, European social theory, creative practices, social practices, creative turn, practical turn, creative society, theory of creative society
How to Cite
Matsevich-Dukhan, I. J. (2021). «The creative turn» in European social theory. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 2, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2021-2-40-49