Categories of philosophy in researching social relationships of forms of ownership

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2021-2-22-29

Abstract

The essence and development of forms of ownership is an insufficiently researched problem. As its analysis, we used the general methodological position of K. Marx on the nature and method of combining labour power with the means of production, namely, the interaction of its two sides, that is, the features of direct production. In this process, the essence of human activity is revealed, on the one hand, he changes the content of the means of production, and on the other hand, he develops his abilities and thereby changes the content of labour, that is, connections and relations, forms of movement of labour power and means of production are revealed in it, expressed by categories and laws. As a result of the study of the interaction of labour power with the means of production, the nature and method of combining labour power with the means of production was substantiated as a category and laws of property development. The purpose of the article is to reveal the meaning of the nature and method of combining labour power with the means of production in the development of property. The methodological basis of the research was the materialist dialectic. This article is a summary of a new system of views on the explanation of the genesis and development of ownership of the means of production.

Author Biography

Alexander I. Vankevich, Independent researcher, Minsk, Belarus

PhD (economics), docent

References

  1. Berkov VF. Methodological crisis in the social and human sciences and ways to overcome the crisis. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2017;2:87–94. Russian.
  2. Lenin VI. [The attitude towards bourgeois parties]. In: Lenin VI. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Tom 15 [Complete collections of works. Volume 15]. 5th edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1961. p. 368–388. Russian.
  3. Marks K. [About Proudhon]. In: Marks K, Engel’s F. Sochineniya. Tom 16 [Collected works. Volume 16]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1955. p. 24–31. Russian.
  4. Marks K. Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859. In: Marks K, Engel’s F. Sochineniya. Tom 46. Chast’ 1 [Collected works. Volume 46. Part 1]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1955. p. 17–508. Russian.
  5. Buzgalin AV, Kolganov AI. [System of industrial relations and socio-economic inequality: dialectics-relationship]. Vo prosy politicheskoi ekonomii. 2018;1:10–34. Russian.
  6. Gegel G. [System of sciences]. In: Gegel G. Sochineniya. Tom 4 [Collected works. Volume 4]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo so tsial’no-ekonomicheskoi literatury;1959. p. 1–488. Russian.
  7. Marx K. The Holy Family or critique of critical criticism: against Bruno Bauer and Company. In: Marks K, Engel’s F. Sochineniya. Tom 2 [Collected works. Volume 2]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1955. p. 3–230. Russian.
  8. Lenin VI. The three sources and three component parts of marxism In: Lenin VI. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Tom 23. [Complete collections of works. Volume 23]. 5th edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1961. p. 40–48. Russian.
  9. Crosland CA. The future of socialism. London: Jonathan Cape; 1957. 540 p.
  10. von Mises L. Socialism: an economic and sociological analysis. London: Cape; 1951. 528 p.
  11. Lenin VI. [Materialism and empirio-criticism]. In: Lenin VI. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Tom 18 [Complete collections of works. Volume 18]. 5th edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1961. p. 7–384. Russian.
  12. Kotts DM. [Marxist political economy and obstacles to promoting economic growth in China]. Voprosy politicheskoi ekonomii. 2016;2:49–65. Russian.
  13. Bodrunov SD. New quality of material production: Marx’s forecast and capitalist realities of the twenty-first century. Marks v eru vysokikh tekhnologii: globalizatsiya, kapital i klassy. Vysokotekhnologicheskoe proizvodstvo i sovremennyi kapitalizm: materialy mezhdunarodnykh nauchnykh seminarov; 26–27 oktyabrya 2018 g.; Kembridzh, Velikobritaniya [Marx in the era of high technologies: globalisation, capital and classes. High-tech production and modern capitalism: materials of international scientific seminars; 2018 October 26–27; Cambridge, Great Britain]. Saint Petersburg: Institute of New Industrial Development; 2018. 107 p. Russian.
  14. Marks K. [Capital. A critique of political economy. Volume III. Book three: the process of capitalist production as a whole]. In: Marks K, Engel’s F. Sochineniya. Tom 25. Chast’ 1 [Collected works. Volume 25. Part 1]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Go sudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury; 1961. p. 3–546. Russian.
Published
2021-06-15
Keywords: category, law, dialectics, development, ownership, means of production, perception, relation, relationship, production relationships, interaction, abstract and concrete, tendency
How to Cite
Vankevich, A. I. (2021). Categories of philosophy in researching social relationships of forms of ownership. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 2, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2021-2-22-29
Issue
No 2 (2021): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology
Section
Articles and Reports

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)