Inner-city socio-spatial inclusion as a source for social development
Abstract
Locally-specific factors in the organisation of the urban environment affect not only the physical space of the city, but also the totality of social practices and relations formed in it. Reproduction of this inner structure causes the development of the urban habitus as the exact pattern of solidarity, which consist of the unique physical, social and institutional integration mechanisms. Urban habitus is represented by the number of the qualitatively different processes of integration: making an environment of confidence, the development of peer support and the formation of the acting subject. The empirical measurement of urban habitus is based on the peculiarities of citizens’ interaction with each other.
References
1. Touraine A. Le retour de l’acteur: Essai de sociologie [The return of the acting man. Essay of sociology]. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard; 1984. 350 p. Russian edition: Touraine A. Vozvrashchenie cheloveka deistvuyushchego. Ocherk sotsiologii. Gretskii MN, editor; Samarskaya EA, translator. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir; 1998. 204 p.
2. Bourdieu P. Les choises dites. Paris: Éditions de Minuit; 1987. Espace social et pouvoir symbolique; p. 147–166. Russian edition: Bourdieu P. [Social space and symbolic power]. Ivanov VI, translator. THESIS. 1993;2:137–150.
3. Steward JH. Evolution and ecology. Essays on social transformation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1977. 406 p.
4. Giddens E. Ustroenie obshchestva: ocherk teorii strukturatsii [The structure of society: an essay on the theory of structuration]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2005. 528 p.
5. Sztompka P. The sociology of social change. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993. 348 p. Russian edition: Sztompka P. Sotsiologiya sotsial’nykh izmenenii. Yadov VA, translator. Moscow: Aspekt press; 1996. 416 p.
6. Arnason J. Communism and modernity. Daedalus. 2000;1:61–90. Russian edition: Arnason J. Communism and modernity. Maslovskii MV, translator. Sociological Journal. 2011;1:10–36.
7. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967. 271 p.
8. Flivbjorg B. [Misunderstandings related to case-study]. Sociological Research. 2005;4:110–120. Russian.
9. Ol’denburg R. Tret’e mesto: kafe, kofeini, knizhnye magaziny, bary, salony krasoty i drugie mesta «tusovok» kak fundament soobshchestva [The great good place: cafes, coffe shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of community]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2014. 456 p. Russian.
10. Wirth L. Izbrannye raboty po sotsiologii. Sbornik perevodov [Selected works in sociology. Collection of translations]. Girko LV, editor; Nikolaev VG, translator. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2005. 243 p.
11. Garfinkel G. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersy: Prentice Hall; 1967. Chapter 2, Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities; p. 35–75. Russian edition: Garfinkel H. [An exploration of the habitual foundations of daily activities]. Turchaninova YuI, Gusinskii EN, translators. Russian Sociological Review. 2002;2(1):41–69. Russian.
12. Bokrat F. [Urban habitus and city habitus]. In: Berking Kh, Lev M, editors. Sobstvennaya logika razvitiya gorodov. Novye podkhody v urbanistike [Own logic of urban development. New approaches in urban studies]. Levinson K, translator. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2019. p. 103–127. Russian.
13. Bourdieu P. Dinstinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. In: Grusky D, editor. Social stratification: class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. Boulder: Westview Press; 1994. p. 404–429. Russian edition: Bourdieu P. Razlichenie: sotsial’naya kritika suzhdeniya. Shmatko NA, Radaev VV, editors; Kirchik OI, translator. Journal of Economic Sociology. 2005;6(3):25–48.
14. Williams R. The long revolution. Middlesex: Penguin; 1965. 399 p.
15. Lee M. Relocating location: cultural geography, the specificity of place and the city habitus. In: McGuigan J, editor. Cultural methodologies. London: Thousand Oaks; 1996. p. 126–141.
16. Luhman N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In: Gambetta D, editor. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2000. p. 94–107.
17. Giddens E. Posledstviya sovremennosti [Implications of modernity]. Ol’khovikov GK, Kibal’chich DA, translators. Moscow: Praxis; 2011. 352 p. Russian.
18. Sztompka P. Zaufanie – fundament spoleczenstwa. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Znak; 2007. 420 s. Russian edition: Sztompka P. Doverie – osnova obshchestva. Morozova NV, translator. Moscow: Logos; 2012. 445 p. Russian.
19. Kratzwald B. [Urban commons. Dissident practices in emancipatory spaces]. In: Dellenbo M, Kip M, B’en’ek M, Myuller AK, Shvegman M, editors. Urban commons. Gorodskie soobshchestva za predelami gosudarstva i rynka [Urban commons. Urban communities beyond the state and the market]. Bezuglov D, translator. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2020. p. 34–55. Russian.
20. Le Galès P. Urban governance and policy networks: on the political boundedness of policy networks, the French case study. Public Administration. 2001;l(79):167–184.
2. Bourdieu P. Les choises dites. Paris: Éditions de Minuit; 1987. Espace social et pouvoir symbolique; p. 147–166. Russian edition: Bourdieu P. [Social space and symbolic power]. Ivanov VI, translator. THESIS. 1993;2:137–150.
3. Steward JH. Evolution and ecology. Essays on social transformation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1977. 406 p.
4. Giddens E. Ustroenie obshchestva: ocherk teorii strukturatsii [The structure of society: an essay on the theory of structuration]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2005. 528 p.
5. Sztompka P. The sociology of social change. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993. 348 p. Russian edition: Sztompka P. Sotsiologiya sotsial’nykh izmenenii. Yadov VA, translator. Moscow: Aspekt press; 1996. 416 p.
6. Arnason J. Communism and modernity. Daedalus. 2000;1:61–90. Russian edition: Arnason J. Communism and modernity. Maslovskii MV, translator. Sociological Journal. 2011;1:10–36.
7. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967. 271 p.
8. Flivbjorg B. [Misunderstandings related to case-study]. Sociological Research. 2005;4:110–120. Russian.
9. Ol’denburg R. Tret’e mesto: kafe, kofeini, knizhnye magaziny, bary, salony krasoty i drugie mesta «tusovok» kak fundament soobshchestva [The great good place: cafes, coffe shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of community]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2014. 456 p. Russian.
10. Wirth L. Izbrannye raboty po sotsiologii. Sbornik perevodov [Selected works in sociology. Collection of translations]. Girko LV, editor; Nikolaev VG, translator. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2005. 243 p.
11. Garfinkel G. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersy: Prentice Hall; 1967. Chapter 2, Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities; p. 35–75. Russian edition: Garfinkel H. [An exploration of the habitual foundations of daily activities]. Turchaninova YuI, Gusinskii EN, translators. Russian Sociological Review. 2002;2(1):41–69. Russian.
12. Bokrat F. [Urban habitus and city habitus]. In: Berking Kh, Lev M, editors. Sobstvennaya logika razvitiya gorodov. Novye podkhody v urbanistike [Own logic of urban development. New approaches in urban studies]. Levinson K, translator. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2019. p. 103–127. Russian.
13. Bourdieu P. Dinstinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. In: Grusky D, editor. Social stratification: class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. Boulder: Westview Press; 1994. p. 404–429. Russian edition: Bourdieu P. Razlichenie: sotsial’naya kritika suzhdeniya. Shmatko NA, Radaev VV, editors; Kirchik OI, translator. Journal of Economic Sociology. 2005;6(3):25–48.
14. Williams R. The long revolution. Middlesex: Penguin; 1965. 399 p.
15. Lee M. Relocating location: cultural geography, the specificity of place and the city habitus. In: McGuigan J, editor. Cultural methodologies. London: Thousand Oaks; 1996. p. 126–141.
16. Luhman N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In: Gambetta D, editor. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2000. p. 94–107.
17. Giddens E. Posledstviya sovremennosti [Implications of modernity]. Ol’khovikov GK, Kibal’chich DA, translators. Moscow: Praxis; 2011. 352 p. Russian.
18. Sztompka P. Zaufanie – fundament spoleczenstwa. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Znak; 2007. 420 s. Russian edition: Sztompka P. Doverie – osnova obshchestva. Morozova NV, translator. Moscow: Logos; 2012. 445 p. Russian.
19. Kratzwald B. [Urban commons. Dissident practices in emancipatory spaces]. In: Dellenbo M, Kip M, B’en’ek M, Myuller AK, Shvegman M, editors. Urban commons. Gorodskie soobshchestva za predelami gosudarstva i rynka [Urban commons. Urban communities beyond the state and the market]. Bezuglov D, translator. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2020. p. 34–55. Russian.
20. Le Galès P. Urban governance and policy networks: on the political boundedness of policy networks, the French case study. Public Administration. 2001;l(79):167–184.
Published
2023-10-29
Keywords:
social development, urban environment, spatial social inclusion, habitus, social trust
How to Cite
LebedevaЕ. V., & Pinchuk, I. V. (2023). Inner-city socio-spatial inclusion as a source for social development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 3, 53-62. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/sociology/article/view/5844
Section
To Know so that to Foresee...
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)
