Methodologycal problems and approaches to identifying and evaluating typical and rare landscapes of the Republic of Belarus

  • Galina I. Martsinkevich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Saveli I. Kuzmin Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Elena E. Davydik Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-3634
  • Aliaksei V. Babko Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6740-2020-2-34-46

Abstract

The analysis of the studying of the problem of identifying and evaluating of typical and rare landscapes was carried out, which showed that quite a lot of knowledge has been accumulated in this area of the identification of such landscapes and the criteria for their assessment. It is established that insufficient attention is paid to the classification and mapping of landscapes, the use of mathematical methods for their assessment. A scientific concept is proposed for the study of typical and rare landscapes, which contains four levels of their study (country, regional, subregional, local), the scale of work corresponding to the level, landscape classification units, criteria and indicators for their allocation are determined. So, at the country level, the criterion for assessing typical landscapes is the degree of representativeness, depending on bioclimatic factors and the large size of the landscape contour, at the regional (provincial) – the contour size of the dominant landscapes of the province and the index of landscape diversity, at the subregional – the intensity of anthropogenic transformation, at the local – characteristic value of attractiveness. The main criteria for assessing rare landscapes at the country level are the small size of the contour and the criteria of uniqueness, at the regional (provincial) indicator of occurrence, at the subregional – naturalness, at local – vulnerability. A geographic information database has been created, a methodology has been developed for identifying typical and rare landscapes and their typology. An assessment of landscape diversity was made and the map showing that typical landscapes are characterised by a high and medium level of diversity, and rare landscapes are characterised by medium and low was created. An assessment of the occurrence of rare landscapes was carried out, which made it possible to distinguish three groups – low, medium, and high occurrence; their list and a map of occurrence were created. It has been determined that unique landscapes, which are part of a group with low occurrence, require special protection. A direct correlation has been established between the level of landscape diversity and occurrence. The proposed criteria for identifying and assessing typical and rare landscapes can be used in organising or transforming nature protected areas, in the design of their passports and conservation obligations.

Author Biographies

Galina I. Martsinkevich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

doctor of science (geography), full professor; chief researcher at the research laboratory of landscape ecology, faculty of geography and geoinformatics.

Saveli I. Kuzmin, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (geography), docent; head of the research laboratory of landscape ecology, faculty of geography
and geoinformatics.

Elena E. Davydik, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

senior researcher at the research laboratory of landscape ecology, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

Aliaksei V. Babko, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

senior researcher at the research laboratory of landscape ecology, faculty of geography and geoinformatics.

References

  1. Martsinkevich GI, Shchasnaya II, Usova IP, cartographers. The landscape map [Republic of Belarus] [map]. Minsk: Belkartografiya; 2014. 1 sheet: 1 : 500 000; 84 × 119; color.
  2. Mjasnikovich MU, et al., editors. National Atlas of Belarus. Minsk: Committee for Land Resources, Geodesy and Cartography at the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus; 2002. 299 p. [Map], Landscape zoning; p. 143, 1 : 4 000 000. Belarusian.
  3. Magurran AE. Ekologicheskoe raznoobrazie i ego izmerenie = Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chernov YuI, editor; Matveeva NV, translator. Moscow: Mir; 1992. 184 p. Co-published by the «Croom Helm».
  4. Jaeger JAG. Landscape division, splitting index and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology. 2000;15(2):115–130. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008129329289.
  5. Grodzyns’kyj MD. Landscape diversity. In: Landshaft jak integrujucha koncepcija XXI storichchja [Landscape as an integrating concept of the 21st century]. Kyiv: University of Kyiv; 1999. p. 50–56. Ukrainian.
  6. Puzachenko YuG, Dyakonov KN, Aleschenko GM. [The diversity of the landscape and methods for measuring it]. In: Kasimov NS, Romanova EP, Tishkov AA, editors. Geography and monitoring of biodiversity. Moscow: Moscow State University; 2002. p. 76–178. Russian.
  7. Pyrozhnik II, Martsinkevich GI, editors. The structure of the geographical environment and landscape diversity of Belarus. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2006. 194 p. Russian.
  8. Jurgenson NA, scientific director. [Management Plan for the Republican Wildlife Refuge «Olmanskie Marshes»] [report on research]. Ustin VV, responsible executor. Minsk: Scientific Research and Production Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources; 2014. 165 p. Russian.
  9. Wascher DM, editor. European landscape character areas – typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Final Project Report. Wageningen: Landscape Europe; 2005. [150 p.]. Co-published by the ELCAI project partners.
  10. Tudor Ch. An approach to landscape character assessment, 2014 [Internet]. [S. l.]: Natural England; 2014 [cited 2020 June 30]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/691184/landscapecharacter-assessment.pdf.
  11. Walz U. Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Reviews in Landscape Research. 2011;5:36–42.
  12. Penning-Rowsell EC. A public preference evaluation of landscape quality. Regional Studies. 1982;16(2):97–112. DOI: 10.1080/09595238200185091.
  13. van der Ploeg SWF, Vlijm L. Ecological evaluation, nature conservation and land use planning with particular reference to methods used in the Netherlands. Biological Conservation. 1978;14(3):197–221. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(78)90011-3.
  14. Smith P, Theberge J. A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas. Environmental Management. 1986;10(6):715–734.
  15. Rutledge D. Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: can pattern reflect process? Wellington: Department of Conservation; 2003. 27 p. (O’Leary H, editor. Doc science internal series 98).
  16. Gehlbach FR. Investigation, evaluation and priority ranking of natural areas. Biological Conservation. 1975;8(2):79–88. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(75)90033-6.
  17. Ribe RG. A test of uniqueness and diversity visual assessment factors using judgement-independent measures. Landscape Research. 1986;11(2):13–15. DOI: 10.1080/01426398608706193.
  18. Sargent FO, Brande JH. Classifying and evaluating unique natural areas for planning purposes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 1976;31(3):113–116.
  19. Ratcliffe D, editor. The selection of biological sites of national importance to nature conservation in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977. 401 p. (A nature conservation review; volume 1).
  20. Solomon DL. A comparative approach to species diversity. In: Grassle JF, Patil GP, Smith WK, Tallie C, editors. Ecological diversity in theory and practice. Burtonsville, Maryland: International Cooperative Publishers; 1979. p. 29–38.
  21. Margules C, Usher MB. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation. 1981;21(2):79–109. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2.
  22. Anderson JE. A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conservation Biology. 1991;5(3):347–352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00148.x.
  23. Wright DF. A site evaluation scheme for use in the assessment of potential nature reserves. Biological Conservation. 1977;11(4):293–305. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90042-8.
  24. Foresta RA. Natural regions for national parks: the Canadian experience. Applied Geography. 1985;5(3):179–194. DOI: 10.1016/0143-6228(85)90021-9.
  25. Leopold LB. Landscape esthetics: how to quantify the scenics of a River Valley. Natural History. 1969;October:36–45.
  26. Pomorov SB. [Attractivity is a fundamental characteristic of landscapes in the design of recreational objects and systems]. Polzunovskii al’manakh. 1999;1:130–140. Russian.
  27. Martsinkevich GI, Kuzmin SI. Innovative approaches and methods for the allocation and mapping of typical and rare landscapes for the purpose of their protection. In: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii. Materialy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennoi 20-letiyu obrazovaniya Natsional’nogo parka «Narochanskii»; 9–11 oktyabrya 2019 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Current status and development prospects of nature protected areas (NPA). Materials of conference with international participation dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the formation of the Narochansky National Park; 2019 October 9–11; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: [s. n.]; 2019. p. 74–79. Russian.
  28. Nikolaev VA. Klassifikatsiya i melkomasshtabnoe kartografirovanie landshaftov [Classification and small-scale mapping of landscapes]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta; 1978. 62 p. Russian.
Published
2020-12-29
Keywords: typical landscape, rare landscape, landscape diversity, landscape occurrence, criterions assessment of landscape, landscape mapping
Supporting Agencies The publication was prepared in the framework of the project No. 1.37 of the state program of scientific research «Nature management and ecology» for 2016–2020 (subprogramme «Natural resources and environmental safety»).
How to Cite
Martsinkevich, G. I., Kuzmin, S. I., Davydik, E. E., & Babko, A. V. (2020). Methodologycal problems and approaches to identifying and evaluating typical and rare landscapes of the Republic of Belarus. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology, 2, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6740-2020-2-34-46
Issue
No 2 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology
Section
Geography

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)