Internal political struggle in Scotland on the issue of the region status in 2007–2011
Abstract
For the first time in the national historiography, various aspects of the internal political struggle in Scotland regarding its political status in 2007–2011 are considered. The key actors in this struggle are identified, the forms and tools used by various political forces to realise their goals are highlighted, and the issue of the Scottish National Party as a government party is explored. The activity of two organisations – «National Conversation» and the Calman Commission, created at the initiative of two opposing camps of Scottish politics, is analysed. It is noted that as a result of their work, the discussion about the political future of the region was brought to a qualitatively new level, and all the main political forces in the region recognised the need to expand the powers of the Scottish Parliament.
References
- Hassan G, Barrow S. A Nation changed? The SNP and Scotland ten years on. Edinburgh: Luath Press; 2017. 368 p.
- Harvey M. Conversing with the nation: consultations and referendums in Scotland and Wales under devolution. Stirling: University of Stirling; 2014. 319 p.
- Paun A, editor. Nations and regions. The dynamics of devolution. Scotland quarterly report. September 2007 [Internet]. The Constitution Unit. 2007 [cited 2021 July 28]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution-unit/files/scotland07.pdf#page=188.
- McEwen N, editor. Nations and regions. The dynamics of devolution. Scotland quarterly report. May 2008 [Internet]. The Constitution Unit. 2008 [cited 2021 July 28]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution-unit/files/scotland08.pdf#page=111.
- Cairney P, editor. Nations and regions. The dynamics of devolution. Scotland quarterly report. January 2009 [Inter net]. The Constitution Unit. 2009 [cited 2021 July 28]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution-unit/files/scotland09.pdf.
- Cairney P, editor. Nations and regions. The dynamics of devolution. Scotland quarterly report. September 2009 [Internet]. The Constitution Unit. 2009 [cited 2021 July 28]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution-unit/files/scotland09.pdf#page=165.
- Your Scotland, your voice. A national conversation [Internet]. BBC. 2009 [cited 2020 February 15]. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/30_11_09_referendum.pdf.
- Ormston R, Reid S. Scottish Social Attitudes Survey 2010. Core module – attitudes to government, the economy and public services in Scotland [Internet]. The Scottish Government. 2011 [cited 2021 July 28]. Available from: https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20170107022402/http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2011/06/29152407/13.
- Re-elect: a Scottish Government working for Scotland [Internet]. Land Matters. 2011 [cited 2020 February 15]. 44 p. Available from: http://www.andywightman.com/docs/SNP_Manifesto_2011.pdf.
- Fighting for What Really Matters – Scottish Labour Party Manifesto 2011 Scottish Parliament Election. Glasgow: Scottish Labour Party; 2011. 98 p.
- Common Sense for Scotland – Scottish Conservatives – Scottish Parliament Election Manifesto 2011. Edinburgh: Scottish Conservatives and Unionist Party; 2011. 36 p.
- Solutions for Scotland – Scottish Liberal Democrats – Scottish Parliament Election Manifesto 2011. Edinburgh: Scottish Liberal Democrats; 2011. 83 p.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)