Особенности внимания современных подростков

  • Ольга Григорьевна Ксенда Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-1099

Аннотация

Описаны характеристики познавательной сферы и когнитивных процессов интернет-поколения. Представлены результаты исследования особенностей внимания подростков с нормой и патологией развития. Обсуждаются выводы о сильном развитии переключаемости внимания и его объема и слабой устойчивости внимания подростков с нормой развития в связи с активным использованием ими цифровых технологий.

Биография автора

Ольга Григорьевна Ксенда , Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

кандидат психологических наук, доцент; доцент кафедры психологии факультета философии и социальных наук

Литература

  1. Jones C, Ramanau R, Cross S, Healing G. Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education. 2009;54(3):722–732. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
  2. Hargittai E, Piper AM, Morris MR. From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2019;18(4):881–890. DOI: 10.5167/uzh-168039.
  3. Hargittai E. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the net generation. Sociological Inquiry. 2010;1(80):92–113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x.
  4. Ozhiganova EM. Straus Howe generational theory. Opportunities of practical application. Biznes-obrazovanie v ekonomike znanii. 2015;1:94–97. Russian.
  5. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816.
  6. Tapscott D. Grown up digital. How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw Hill; 2009. 368 p.
  7. Tsareva AV. Human being in the Net: the change of web generations. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2012;15(5):36–54. Russian.
  8. Berezhnaya NYu. Generation Next: psychological characteristics. Kul’tura i obrazovanie. 2015;4:34–37. Russian.
  9. Karaseva SE, Kofeynikova YuL. [Features of the personal and cognitive development of the digital generation]. Obshchestvo. 2016;1:56–57. Russian.
  10. Arkhangelskaya EE. [Communicative features of younger students of the digital generation]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii. 2018;11:49–51. Russian.
  11. Grekova AA. Features of thinking of the Net generation. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Psychology. 2019;12(1):28–38. Russian. DOI: 10.14529/psy190103.
  12. Istomina EA, Savonova EV. Psychological portrait of digital generation. In: Zeer EF, Tretyakova VS, editors. Transprofessionalizm kak prediktor sotsial’no-professional’noi mobil’nosti molodezhi. Materialy Vserossiiskoi (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 28 yanvarya 2019 g.; Nizhnii Tagil, Rossiya [Transprofessionalism as a predictor of social and professional mobility of youth. Materials of the All-Russian (with international participation) scientific-practical conference; 2019 January 28; Nizhny Tagil, Russia]. Yekaterinburg: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi professional’no-pedagogicheskii universitet; 2019. p. 171–174. Russian.
  13. Bogacheva NV, Sivak EV. Mify o «pokolenii Z» [Myths about the «generation Z»]. Moscow: HSE University; 2019. 64 p. Russian.
  14. Praslov MS. [Psychological features of the digital generation]. Kollektsiya gumanitarnykh issledovanii. 2016;3:92–97. Russian.
  15. Zhu S. Teenagers mobile-phone usage and text message. In: Society for information technology and teacher education international conference; 2014 March 17; Jacksonville, Florida, United States. Wayriesville: Association for the advancement of computing in education; 2014. p. 1724–1731.
  16. Sobkin VS. The modern teenager on social networks. Pedagogika. 2016;8:61–72. Russian.
  17. Sobkin VS, Fedotova AV. Social media as a field of a modern teenager’s socialization. Conseling Psychology and Psichotherapy. 2019;27(3):119–137. Russian. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2019270308.
  18. Monibi M, Hayes GR. Mocotos: mobile communications tools for children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 7th International conference on interaction design and children; 2008 June 11–13; Chicago, USA. New York: Association for computing machinery; 2010. p. 79–89.
  19. Garzotto F, Bordogna F. Paper-based multimedia interaction as learning tool for disabled children. In: Proceedings of the 9th International conference on interaction design and children; 2010 June 09–12; Barcelona, Spain. New York: Association for computing machinery; 2010. p. 79–88.
  20. Hayes GR. Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2010;14(7):663–680. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-010-0294-8.
  21. Ohrstrom P. Helping autism-diagnosed teenagers navigate and develop socially using e-learning based on mobile persuasion. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2011;12(4):54–71. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v1214.878.
  22. Zvonov PA. [The digital generation and its features]. Vestnik magistratury. 2018;12(4):79–82. Russian.
  23. Wegner D, Ward A. How the Internet is changing our brain. V mire nauki. 2014;2:98–102. Russian.
  24. Morozov E. Tekhnonenavist’: kak internet otuchil nas dumat’ [Techno-hatred: how the Internet has taught us not to think]. Мoscow: Common place; 2014. 116 p. Russian.
  25. Soldatova GU, Rasskazova EI. Excessive use of the Internet: signs and factors. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013;34(4): 79–88. Russian.
  26. Gobbo E, Torrebruno A. Technologies and diseases: computer as a support in the school system. Two case studies from the discetech project. In: Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003 – World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications; 2003 June 23–28; Honolulu, Hawaii. Waynesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; 2003. p. 2368–2369.
  27. Rossade KD, Heins B, Hampel R. Instant messaging in distributed and distance language learning. In: Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005 – World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications; 2005 June 27 – July 2; Montreal, Canada. Waynesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; 2005. p. 800–807.
  28. Alemastseva PV. [Attention: theories, types and properties]. In: Grabozdin YuP. Aktual’nye nauchnye issledovaniya. Sbornik statei XXXVI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 30 dekabrya 2017 g.; Samara, Rossiya [Actual scientific research. Collection of articles of the International scientific and practical conference; 2017 December 30; Samara, Russia]. Samara: Tsentr nauchnykh issledovanii i konsaltinga; 2017. p. 127–129. Russian.
  29. Gabdulina LI. Podkhody k issledovaniyu vnimaniya v otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi psikhologii [Approaches to research attention in domestic and foreign psychology]. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University; 2007. 52 p. Russian.
  30. Dye MWG, Bavelier D. Differential development of visual attention skills in school-age children. Vision Research. 2010;50(4):452–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.010.
  31. Gentile DA. Swing EL, Choon GL, Khoo A. Video game playing, attention prob lems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychology of popular media culture. 2012;1(1):62–70. DOI: 10.1037/a0026969.
  32. Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. Media multitasking, mind, and brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 115(40):9889–9896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611612115.
  33. Posner M, Rothbart M, Voelker PMW. Developing brain networks of attention. Current opinion in pediatrics. 2016; 28:720–724. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000413.
  34. Kasatkina NE, Bryksina ES. Age peculiarities of teenagers and methods of educational process organization. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2014;3(1):75–77. Russian.
  35. Dikevich OYu. Osobennosti vnimaniya podrostkov s normoi i zaderzhkoi psikhicheskogo razvitiya [Features of attention of adolescents with norm and mental retardation; graduate work]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2019. 55 p. Russian.
  36. Gribanova GV. Psikhologicheskaya kharakteristika lichnosti podrostkov s zaderzhkoi psikhicheskogo razvitiya [Psychological characteristics of personality of adolescents with mental retardation]. Moscow: Nauka; 2010. 162 p. Russian.
  37. Troitskaya LA. Osobennosti emotsional’noi sfery i poznavatel’noi deyatel’nosti u detei i podrostkov v norme i pri patologii TsNS [Features of the emotional sphere and cognitive activity in children and adolescents in the norm and in the pathology of the central nervous system] [dissertation abstract]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities; 2009. 55 p. Russian.
  38. Polyakov AM. Sub’ekt i simvol [The subject and the symbol]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2014. 255 p. Russian.
  39. Frumkin K. [Clip thinking and the fate of linear text]. Topos [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 July 22]. Available from: https://www.topos.ru/article/7371.
  40. Vygotskii LS. Tipologiya razvitiya [Developmental psychology]. Moscow: Yurait; 2016. 303 p. Russian.
  41. Gal’perin PYa, Kabyl’nitskaya SL. [Experimental attention building]. In: Dubrovina IV, Prikhozhin AM, Zashchepin VV, compilers. Vozrastnaya i pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Developmental and educational psychology]. Moscow: Academy; 1999. p. 149–155. Russian.
  42. Uznadze DN. Obshchaya psikhologiya [General psychology]. Chomakhidze ESh, translator; Imedadze IV, editor. Moscow: Smysl; 2004. 413 p. Co-published by the «Piter». Russian.
  43. Rubinshtein LS. [Attention]. In: Dubrova VP, Kovalevich AV, compilers. Osnovy psikhologii [The basics of pshychology]. Minsk: Belarus’; 2003. p. 225–238. Russian.
Опубликован
2020-09-19
Ключевые слова: внимание, подростки, когнитивные процессы
Как цитировать
Ксенда , О. Г. (2020). Особенности внимания современных подростков. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология, 2, 98-107. Доступно по https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/2122