Features of attention of modern teenagers
Abstract
The paper describes the characteristics of the cognitive sphere and cognitive processes of the Internet generation. The results of a study of the attention features of adolescents with normal and developmental pathology are presented. Conclusions about the strong development of attention switchability and its volume and the weak stability of attention of adolescents with a normal rate of development due to their active use of digital technologies are discussed.
References
- Jones C, Ramanau R, Cross S, Healing G. Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education. 2009;54(3):722–732. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
- Hargittai E, Piper AM, Morris MR. From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2019;18(4):881–890. DOI: 10.5167/uzh-168039.
- Hargittai E. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the net generation. Sociological Inquiry. 2010;1(80):92–113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x.
- Ozhiganova EM. Straus Howe generational theory. Opportunities of practical application. Biznes-obrazovanie v ekonomike znanii. 2015;1:94–97. Russian.
- Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816.
- Tapscott D. Grown up digital. How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw Hill; 2009. 368 p.
- Tsareva AV. Human being in the Net: the change of web generations. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2012;15(5):36–54. Russian.
- Berezhnaya NYu. Generation Next: psychological characteristics. Kul’tura i obrazovanie. 2015;4:34–37. Russian.
- Karaseva SE, Kofeynikova YuL. [Features of the personal and cognitive development of the digital generation]. Obshchestvo. 2016;1:56–57. Russian.
- Arkhangelskaya EE. [Communicative features of younger students of the digital generation]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii. 2018;11:49–51. Russian.
- Grekova AA. Features of thinking of the Net generation. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Psychology. 2019;12(1):28–38. Russian. DOI: 10.14529/psy190103.
- Istomina EA, Savonova EV. Psychological portrait of digital generation. In: Zeer EF, Tretyakova VS, editors. Transprofessionalizm kak prediktor sotsial’no-professional’noi mobil’nosti molodezhi. Materialy Vserossiiskoi (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 28 yanvarya 2019 g.; Nizhnii Tagil, Rossiya [Transprofessionalism as a predictor of social and professional mobility of youth. Materials of the All-Russian (with international participation) scientific-practical conference; 2019 January 28; Nizhny Tagil, Russia]. Yekaterinburg: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi professional’no-pedagogicheskii universitet; 2019. p. 171–174. Russian.
- Bogacheva NV, Sivak EV. Mify o «pokolenii Z» [Myths about the «generation Z»]. Moscow: HSE University; 2019. 64 p. Russian.
- Praslov MS. [Psychological features of the digital generation]. Kollektsiya gumanitarnykh issledovanii. 2016;3:92–97. Russian.
- Zhu S. Teenagers mobile-phone usage and text message. In: Society for information technology and teacher education international conference; 2014 March 17; Jacksonville, Florida, United States. Wayriesville: Association for the advancement of computing in education; 2014. p. 1724–1731.
- Sobkin VS. The modern teenager on social networks. Pedagogika. 2016;8:61–72. Russian.
- Sobkin VS, Fedotova AV. Social media as a field of a modern teenager’s socialization. Conseling Psychology and Psichotherapy. 2019;27(3):119–137. Russian. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2019270308.
- Monibi M, Hayes GR. Mocotos: mobile communications tools for children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 7th International conference on interaction design and children; 2008 June 11–13; Chicago, USA. New York: Association for computing machinery; 2010. p. 79–89.
- Garzotto F, Bordogna F. Paper-based multimedia interaction as learning tool for disabled children. In: Proceedings of the 9th International conference on interaction design and children; 2010 June 09–12; Barcelona, Spain. New York: Association for computing machinery; 2010. p. 79–88.
- Hayes GR. Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2010;14(7):663–680. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-010-0294-8.
- Ohrstrom P. Helping autism-diagnosed teenagers navigate and develop socially using e-learning based on mobile persuasion. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2011;12(4):54–71. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v1214.878.
- Zvonov PA. [The digital generation and its features]. Vestnik magistratury. 2018;12(4):79–82. Russian.
- Wegner D, Ward A. How the Internet is changing our brain. V mire nauki. 2014;2:98–102. Russian.
- Morozov E. Tekhnonenavist’: kak internet otuchil nas dumat’ [Techno-hatred: how the Internet has taught us not to think]. Мoscow: Common place; 2014. 116 p. Russian.
- Soldatova GU, Rasskazova EI. Excessive use of the Internet: signs and factors. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013;34(4): 79–88. Russian.
- Gobbo E, Torrebruno A. Technologies and diseases: computer as a support in the school system. Two case studies from the discetech project. In: Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003 – World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications; 2003 June 23–28; Honolulu, Hawaii. Waynesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; 2003. p. 2368–2369.
- Rossade KD, Heins B, Hampel R. Instant messaging in distributed and distance language learning. In: Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005 – World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications; 2005 June 27 – July 2; Montreal, Canada. Waynesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; 2005. p. 800–807.
- Alemastseva PV. [Attention: theories, types and properties]. In: Grabozdin YuP. Aktual’nye nauchnye issledovaniya. Sbornik statei XXXVI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 30 dekabrya 2017 g.; Samara, Rossiya [Actual scientific research. Collection of articles of the International scientific and practical conference; 2017 December 30; Samara, Russia]. Samara: Tsentr nauchnykh issledovanii i konsaltinga; 2017. p. 127–129. Russian.
- Gabdulina LI. Podkhody k issledovaniyu vnimaniya v otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi psikhologii [Approaches to research attention in domestic and foreign psychology]. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University; 2007. 52 p. Russian.
- Dye MWG, Bavelier D. Differential development of visual attention skills in school-age children. Vision Research. 2010;50(4):452–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.010.
- Gentile DA. Swing EL, Choon GL, Khoo A. Video game playing, attention prob lems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychology of popular media culture. 2012;1(1):62–70. DOI: 10.1037/a0026969.
- Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. Media multitasking, mind, and brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 115(40):9889–9896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611612115.
- Posner M, Rothbart M, Voelker PMW. Developing brain networks of attention. Current opinion in pediatrics. 2016; 28:720–724. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000413.
- Kasatkina NE, Bryksina ES. Age peculiarities of teenagers and methods of educational process organization. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2014;3(1):75–77. Russian.
- Dikevich OYu. Osobennosti vnimaniya podrostkov s normoi i zaderzhkoi psikhicheskogo razvitiya [Features of attention of adolescents with norm and mental retardation; graduate work]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2019. 55 p. Russian.
- Gribanova GV. Psikhologicheskaya kharakteristika lichnosti podrostkov s zaderzhkoi psikhicheskogo razvitiya [Psychological characteristics of personality of adolescents with mental retardation]. Moscow: Nauka; 2010. 162 p. Russian.
- Troitskaya LA. Osobennosti emotsional’noi sfery i poznavatel’noi deyatel’nosti u detei i podrostkov v norme i pri patologii TsNS [Features of the emotional sphere and cognitive activity in children and adolescents in the norm and in the pathology of the central nervous system] [dissertation abstract]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities; 2009. 55 p. Russian.
- Polyakov AM. Sub’ekt i simvol [The subject and the symbol]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2014. 255 p. Russian.
- Frumkin K. [Clip thinking and the fate of linear text]. Topos [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 July 22]. Available from: https://www.topos.ru/article/7371.
- Vygotskii LS. Tipologiya razvitiya [Developmental psychology]. Moscow: Yurait; 2016. 303 p. Russian.
- Gal’perin PYa, Kabyl’nitskaya SL. [Experimental attention building]. In: Dubrovina IV, Prikhozhin AM, Zashchepin VV, compilers. Vozrastnaya i pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Developmental and educational psychology]. Moscow: Academy; 1999. p. 149–155. Russian.
- Uznadze DN. Obshchaya psikhologiya [General psychology]. Chomakhidze ESh, translator; Imedadze IV, editor. Moscow: Smysl; 2004. 413 p. Co-published by the «Piter». Russian.
- Rubinshtein LS. [Attention]. In: Dubrova VP, Kovalevich AV, compilers. Osnovy psikhologii [The basics of pshychology]. Minsk: Belarus’; 2003. p. 225–238. Russian.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)