The place of artificial intelligence technologies in the modern society

  • Danila G. Dabrarodni Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus
  • Aliaksei I. Verashchaka Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technologies (AIT) are increasingly manifesting themselves in various spheres of society. There are more and more situations when AIT perform functions that were previously performed only by a man, but at the same time they do not have the appropriate status to be considered a social subject, the author of a work or be responsible for the actions committed. The question about the status of AIT arises, that is, about the nature of the relations of such objects with other social actors, about the norms governing these relationships, about mutual responsibility. In this regard, attempts are being made around the world to establish the legal status of AIT and legal regulation in this area. However, in our opinion, legal regulation should be based on understanding of the ontological and social place of AIT, that is, on understanding of the specifics of such objects as forms of being, their social roles and functions in the system of social ties and relationships. Modern philosophical concepts will help us in understanding the unique state of AIT (research of science and technology, actor-network theory and postphenomenology). In the end of this article the main conditions and principles of regulation in the field of production and distribution of AIT are formulated.

Author Biographies

Danila G. Dabrarodni, Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

PhD (philosophy), docent; director of the Institute of Social Science and Humanities Education

 

Aliaksei I. Verashchaka, Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

PhD (philosophy); head of the Center for Digital and Multimedia Technologies in Education

References

  1. Vereshchako AI. Dinamika issledovatel’skikh programm v klassicheskoi i postklassicheskoi filosofii tekhniki [Dynamics of research programmes in classical and postclassical philosophy of technology] [dissertation]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2022. 175 p. Russian.
  2. Vakhshtain VS. Tekhnika, ili Obayanie progressa [Technique, or The charm of progress]. Saint Petersburg: EUSP Press; 2021. 156 p. Russian.
  3. Chamayou G. Teoriya drona [Drone theory]. Blinov E, translator; Alekseeva A, editor. Moscow: Ad marginem; 2020. 277 p. Russian.
  4. Vorob’eva IV, Salakhutdinov VD. [Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence]. In: Semenov AV, editor. Malyshevskie chteniya – 2020. Nauka i obrazovanie: budushchee i tseli ustoichivogo razvitiya. Materialy XVI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Chast’ 4 [Malyshev readings – 2020. Science and education: the future and sustainable development goals. Materials of the 16th International scientific conference. Part 4]. Moscow: Private educational institution of higher education «Moscow University named after S. Yu. Witte»; 2020. р. 62–72. Russian.
  5. Belаkrylаva VA, Dabrarodni DG. Convergence of social and information technologies and the problem of trust in a digital society. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 2022;1:18–26. Russian.
  6. Kline R, Pinch T. Users as agents of technological change: the social construction of the automobile in the rural united states. Technology and Culture. 1996;37(4):763–795. DOI: 10.2307/3107097.
  7. Bijker WE. The social construction of Bakelite: toward a theory of invention. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ, editors. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1987. р. 159–187.
  8. Forsythe DE. The construction of work in artificial intelligence. Science, Technology & Human Valuese. 1993;18:460–479.
  9. Bailey DE, Barley SR. Beyond design and use: how scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 October 29];30(2). Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/getaccess/pii/S147177271830232X/purchase.
  10. Markoff J. Machines of loving grace: the quest for common ground between humans and robots. New York: Ecco; 2015. 400 p.
  11. Kurzweil R. Evolyutsiya razuma, ili Beskonechnye vozmozhnosti chelovecheskogo mozga, osnovannye na raspoznavanii obrazov [The evolution of the mind, or The infinite possibilities of the human brain bases on pattern recognition]. Maslova TP, translator. Moscow: Eksmo; 2018. 349 p. Russian.
  12. Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. 301 p.
  13. Ihde D. Experimental phenomenology: multistabilities. 2nd edition. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2012. 216 p.
  14. Rosenberger R. Callous objects: designs against the homeless. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2017. XX, 89 p.
Published
2024-01-30
Keywords: philosophy of technology, artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence technologies (AIT), ontological and social status of AIT, regulation in the field of artificial intelligence, postphenomenology, actor-network theory
How to Cite
Dabrarodni, D. G., & Verashchaka, A. I. (2024). The place of artificial intelligence technologies in the modern society. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 66-74. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/6017