Influence of Turkey on the policy of neutrality and foreign policy of Turkmenistan (1995–2016)
Abstract
The paper analyzes the attitude of Turkey to the policy of neutrality of Turkmenistan in the period from 1995 to 2016. Based on the geopolitical situation in the Central Asian region in the post-Soviet period, the author identifies the reasons for Turkmenistan’s adoption of a neutral status. Among the reasons for this decision by the Turkmen leadership are the deterioration of the situation in the region, the desire of the great powers and regional leaders to strengthen their positions in Central Asia, including in the energy sector, Turkey’s active position in the post-Soviet period aimed at developing political, energy, and humanitarian contacts, and the desire of The Niyazov regime to limit external influence on the country’s internal and foreign policy. The author noted the influence of the status of neutrality on the implementation of Turkmenistan’s foreign policy and the attitude of Turkey to this process. In the development of Turkmenistan’s neutrality policy in 1995–2016, two stages can be conditionally distinguished: the first is 1995–2006 when the policy of neutrality bordering on isolationism, which seriously limited Turkey’s contacts with Turkmenistan; the second is 2007–2016 when the expansion of cooperation between Turkmenistan and Turkey, including in the security sphere. In the 2007–2016 Turkey sought to expand its geopolitical influence over Turkmenistan by maintaining its neutrality, which led to the formation of a close political and economic dialogue between Ankara and Ashgabat.
References
- Kuchinskaya ME. [Where are the former «euronature»? (Example of Sweden and Finland)]. Problema Natsional’noi strategii. 2012;615:109–127. Russian.
- Skripuchij DV. [Turkmen neutrality: domestic and geopolitical construction project]. Aktual'nye voprosy istorii i politologii. 2013;25:60–72. Russian.
- Troitsky EV. Turkmenistan’s Foreign Policy in 1992–2006: from neutrality to self-isolation. Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2014;4:67–70. Russian.
- Troitsky EV. [Turkey’s policy in Central Asia (1992–2000)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009;328:84–88. Russian.
- Tulpakov MV. Changing the geopolitical role of Turkmenistan at the beginning of the 21st century. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series: International Relations. Area Studies. 2014;18:227–235. Russian.
- Petersen A. Russia, China and energy geopolitics in Central Asia. London: Centre for European Reform; 2011. 64 p. Russian edition: Petersen A. Rossiya, Kitai i energeticheskaya geopolitika v Tsentral’noi Azii. Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; 2012. 90 p.
- Davis JK. Central Asia in U. S. strategy and operational planning: where do we go from here? Washington: The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis; 2004. 100 p.
- Pirozhnik II. Problemy politicheskoi geografii [Problems of political geography]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2005. 234 p. Russian.
- Khizhuk AV. Neutrality of Turkmenistan is the basis of interaction between higher Education institutions of Turkmenistan and Russia. In: Technological University. Future trends, organizational forms and effectiveness of cooperation development between Russian and foreign universities. Proceedings of the 3rd International scientific conference; 2015 April 6–7; Naukograd Korolev Moscow Region. Korolev: Alkor Publishers; 2015. p. 379–384. Russian.
- Parubochaya EF. The summits of the Turkic states (1992–2001): the real platform for closer relations? Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2011;16(1):113–120. Russian. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2011.1.16.
- Mirzekhanov VS, Tyulpakov MV. Turkmenistan and the Islamic world. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 9. Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika. 2019;3:72–91. DOI: 10.31249/rva/2019.03.02. Russian.
- Starchak M. [USA vs Russia in an attempt to cooperate with Turkmenistan in the field of security and defense]. Tsentral’naya Aziya i Kavkaz. 2009;2:95–102. Russian.
- Abdrakhmanov A. [Turkmenistan: changes in the structure of state power and policy]. Tsentral’naya Aziya i Kavkaz. 2007;3:154–165. Russian.
- Shimshek G. After the Convention on the Caspian sea, Turkey will receive oil and gas from this region [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 November 18]. Available from: https://inosmi.ru/politic/20180815/243000489.html. Russian.
- Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan did not share the Kyapaz (Serdar) on the Caspian sea [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 November 18]. Available from: https://neftegaz.ru/news/view/103196-Azerbaydzhan-s-Turkmeniey-ne-podelili-Kyapaz-Serdar-na-Kaspiyskom-more. Russian.
- Aramedova A. Turkmenistan – Turkish Republic road of long-term partnership [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 November 18]. Available from: http://turkmenistan.gov.tm/?id=4134. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)