The Muslim Brotherhood in Europe: organisational and ideological transformation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/2520-6338-2020-4-80-90

Abstract

Political Islam has become an important factor of the international politics nowadays. By the beginning of the 21st century Islamist political groups have turned to be a matter of concern not only of the Middle East main stakeholders, but also the European and American ones. This circumstance has been aggravated even more, considering the fact, that, being a former metropolis, Europe had come to be a kind of cradle for the spread of Islam. The proportion of the Islamic population has been growing here year by year. Moreover, the migration waves following the 2011 Arab spring provoked even more tough migration crisis and posed a complicated challenge to the European society expressed in conciliation of freedom of religion within its Muslim community along with the preserving European values of secular democracy. The Society of the Muslim Brotherhood has always been considered to be a leading Islamist force not only in Arabic world but in the West as well. Indeed, if in the Middle East they position themselves rather as a political force, even though with wide representation, in Europe the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood claims to be a representative of the Muslim population of the region as a whole. Taking into account the growing Islamic presence in the continent, a certain anxiety in the European society cannot but exist, concerning the risk of conscious Islamic expansion. In this circumstances the question, whether this process is really taking place as well as which role the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood plays in it, came to the fore. This article tries to answer this question, analysing the different stages of the group’s ideological transformation and its influence on the group’s activity in Europe. The author comes to the conclusion, that being a movement, that has undergone substantial ideological transformation, the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood has followed a similar scenario in Europe. Since the organisation itself has made a long way from a militant organisation with anti-Western discourse to a moderate movement, claiming to be democratically oriented and tolerant to the West, their European branch has transformed from a small Islamist group in temporary exile in the enemy camp, to the organisation, considering itself a representative of the European Muslim community, as well as accepting Europe as a motherland.

Author Biography

Aliaksandra A. Kondral, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (history); associate professor at the department of modern and contemporary history, faculty of history.

References

  1. Amhar S. «Muslim Brotherhood» in Europe. Analysis of the Islamic organisation. Al-maktabat al-Iskandariya: [s. n.]; 2012. 28 p. Arabic.
  2. Maréchal B. Le devenir des Frères musulmans: entre visibilité et déclin. Larevuenouvelle. 2007;9:26–31.
  3. al-Banna H. Collection of messages of imam Hasan al-Banna. Cairo: Dar ad-Dawat li at-Taba wa at-Tavzia; 1998. 756 p. Arabic.
  4. Rutherford B. Egypt after Mubarak. Liberalism, Islam and democracy in the Arab world. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008. 280 p.
  5. Leiken R, Brooke S. The moderate Muslim Brotherhood. Foreign Affairs. 2007:2:108–116.
  6. Emerson M, Youngs R. Political Islam and European foreign policy perspectives from Muslim democrats of Medditarranean. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies; 2007. 196 p.
  7. Razhbadinov M. Egipetskoe dvizhenie «Brat’ev-musul’man» [Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood movement]. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Science; 2004. 434 p. Russian.
  8. Qutb S. Milestones on the way. Cairo: Dar Ash-Shuruk; 1982. 202 p. Arabic.
  9. Vidino L. Programme on extremism. The Muslim Brotherhood in Austria. Washington: George Washington University; 2017. 50 p.
  10. Khizriev AYa. [«Muslim Brothers» in Western countries: organisation and spread of ideology (Great Britain, Germany, France)]. Problemy natsional’noi strategii. 2014;5:236–250. Russian.
  11. Manukyan S. [Islamic fundamentalism in Syria (30–60s)]. In: Fedorchenko AV, Filonik AO, editors. Vostokovednyi sbornik. Vypusk 4 [Orientalist collection. Issue 4]. Moscow: Institut izucheniya Izrailya i Blizhnego Vostoka; 2002. p. 150– 179. Russian.
  12. Wickham C. Mobilizing Islam. New York: Columbia University Press; 2002. 300 p.
  13. Rubin B. Islamic fundamentalism in Egyptian politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002. 222 p.
  14. Kireev NG. Istoriya Turtsii. XX vek [History of Turkey of the 20th century]. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Science; 2007. 608 p. Russian.
  15. Kondral AA. Obshchestvenno-politicheskaya deyatel’nost’ assotsiatsii «Brat’ev-musul’man» v Egipte (2005–2012 gg.) [Social and political activities of the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt (2005–2012)] [dissertation]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2015. 139 p. Russian.
  16. Pargeter A. The Muslim Brotherhood. The burden of traditions. London: [s. n.]; 2010. 248 p.
  17. Landa RG. Istoriya Alzhira XX v. [History of Algeria in the 20th century]. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Science; 2017. 220 p. Russian.
  18. Grewal S. From Islamists to Muslim democrats: the case of Tunisia’s Ennahda. American Political Science Review. 2020;114(2):519–535.
Published
2020-10-25
Keywords: Islam in Europe, the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood, political Islam, ideological transformation, European Muslim community, European Muslims, Federation of Islamic Organisation in Europe
How to Cite
Kondral A. A. The Muslim Brotherhood in Europe: organisational and ideological transformation // Journal of the Belarusian State University. History. 2020. 4. PP. 80-90.
Issue
No 4 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
Section
World History

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)