Elements of militarisation of the Atbasar and Botai cultures of Northern Kazakhstan

  • Dosbol S. Baigunakov al-Faraby Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Avenue, Alma-Ata 050040, Kazakhstan
  • Victor F. Zaibert al-Faraby Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Avenue, Alma-Ata 050040, Kazakhstan
  • Gulmira E. Sabdenova al-Faraby Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Avenue, Alma-Ata 050040, Kazakhstan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/2520-6338-2022-4-43-52

Abstract

The huge changes that took place after the domestication of the horse at the beginning of the paleometall in the field of material and spiritual culture, in the social organisation of societies, undoubtedly affected the production of various tools. There were new types of tools that could be used as weapons. The tips of spears, arrows, darts, knives, harpoons, hammers, bolas and other artifacts from more than two hundred sites of Northern Kazakhstan, related to the Atbasar (7000–3000 BC) and Botai (4000–3000 BC) cultures give an opportunity to consider questions of forms of early militarisation of ancient societies. Some tools, their seriality and significant standardisation indicate that they could be universal and complex, they were used in agriculture, as well as in military clashes. After the domestication of the horse, the world of paleometall entered a new generation of wars aimed at the direct destruction of the enemy by cavalry. This is a fundamental change in the nature of armed conflicts, the transformation of the content of war or armed struggle in Antiquity. If the hostile conflicts among hunter-gatherers, which were the bearers of the Atbasar culture, are primarily local, then for the Botai people they are already reaching the interregional level.

Author Biographies

Dosbol S. Baigunakov, al-Faraby Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Avenue, Alma-Ata 050040, Kazakhstan

doctor of science (history), full professor; dean of the faculty of history

Victor F. Zaibert, al-Faraby Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Avenue, Alma-Ata 050040, Kazakhstan

doctor of science (history), full professor; director of the Research Institute «Archaeology and
Steppe Civilisations»

Gulmira E. Sabdenova, al-Faraby Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Avenue, Alma-Ata 050040, Kazakhstan

PhD (history), docent; associate professor at the department of world history, historiography and source studies

References

  1. Baigunakov D, Sabdenova G. Some results of studying the ancient history of Kazakhstan. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;131:304–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.121.
  2. Beletskaya NP. [About the geomorphology of the North Kazakhstan region]. In: Puzyreva AA, editor. Voprosy regional’noi geografii Kazakhstana [Questions of regional geography of Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata: Izdatel’stvo KazPI; 1983. p. 59–63. Russian.
  3. Zaibert V, Pleshakov A, Tyulebayev A. The Atbasar culture. Astana: Branch of the Institute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Margulan; 2012. 352 p. Kazakh, Russian, English.
  4. Zdanovich GB, Ivanov IV, Khabdulina MK. [Experience in the use of paleosurface research methods in archaeology (Kara-Oba and Obaly mounds in Northern Kazakhstan)]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya. 1984;4:35-48. Russian.
  5. Zaibert VF. Atbasarskaya kul’tura [Atbasar culture]. Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1992. 221 p. Russian.
  6. Hinayat B, Isabekov K. Sajatshylyk kazaktyn dastyrli anshylygy [Traditional Kazakh hunting hut]. Alma-Ata: Almatykitap; 2007. 208 p. Kazakh.
  7. Dementiev VI. Osnovy okhotovedeniya [Fundamentals of hunting]. Moscow: Lesnaya promyshlennost’; 1971. 236 p. Russian.
  8. Dezhkin VV. Okhota i okhotnich’e khozyaistvo mira [Hunting and hunting economy of the world]. Moscow: Lesnaya promyshlennost’; 1985. 358 p. Russian.
  9. Kaliyeva SS, Logvin VN. Some details on problem of domestication of the horse from Tersek and Botajsk sites. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2022 August 11];2:246-255. Available from: http://ipdn.ru/_private/a15/246-255.pdf. Russian.
  10. Nurushev MJ. Botaya horse and its importance in the study of Euroasian culture and the problems of Equus genus domestication. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2011;7:361-364. Russian.
  11. Lavrov SB. Lev Gumilev: sud’ba i idei [Lev Gumilev: fate and ideas]. Moscow: Iris-press; 2007. 608 p. Russian.
  12. Zaibert VF, Khazbulatov AR, Outram Alan, Baigunakov DS, Bekseitov GT, Nauryzbayeva EK, et al. Sakral’nye konteksty botaiskoi kul’tury [Sacred contexts of Botai culture]. Astana: Kazakh Research Institute of Culture; 2018. 380 p. Russian.
  13. Zaibert VF. Botaiskaya kul’tura [Botai culture]. Alma-Ata: KazAkparat; 2009. 576 p. Russian.
  14. Zaibert VF, Baigunakov DS, Sabdenova GE. Botai’s historical and cultural significance (for the 40th anniversary of the opening). Abay Kazakh National Pedagogical University Bulletin. Series «Historical and socio-political sciences». 2020;2(65):506–514. DOI: 10.51889/2020-2.1728-5461.34.
  15. Baigunakov D. From the history of the Kazakhstan’s Eneolithic study. In: Siebenberg L, editor. 2nd International scientific conference «European applied sciences: modern approaches in scientific researches». Volume 1; 2013 February 18–19; Stuttgard, Germany. Stuttgard: ORT Publishing; 2013. p. 94–96.
  16. Khudiakov YuS. On symbolism of arrows by Ancient and medieval Central Asian nomads. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2004;1:102-111. Russian.
  17. Khudyakov YuS. A spear and an arrow as symbols of military and state power in Ancient and medieval nomads of Central Asia. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2012;7:20–26. Russian.
  18. Zaibert VF. [Dynamics of interaction of natural-ecological and socio-economic factors in the process of formation and development of the producing economy in the steppes of Kazakhstan]. In: Masson VM, editor. Vzaimodeistviya kochevykh kul’tur i drevnikh tsivilisatsii [Interactions of nomadic cultures and ancient civilisations]. Alma-Ata: Nauka; 1989. p. 171–179. Russian.
  19. Zakharov SV. On the question of the origin of the Botai culture. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2022 August 11];1:49–58. Available from: http://ipdn.ru/_private/a12/49-58.pdf. Russian.
  20. Nikulina NM. Ritual hammer-axes of тне trojan тreasure «L» (the problem of dating of the archaeological complex). Vestnik drevnei istorii. 1999;2:218–228. Russian.
  21. Slavchev V, Baigunakov D, Sabdenova G. The Eneolithic of Kazakhstan: the history of study and the main problems. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Journal of History. 2017;4:40–45.
Published
2022-11-03
Keywords: Northern Kazakhstan, Neolithic, Eneolithic, hunting, horse breeding, conflict, militarisation
How to Cite
Baigunakov D. S., Zaibert V. F., Sabdenova G. E. Elements of militarisation of the Atbasar and Botai cultures of Northern Kazakhstan // Journal of the Belarusian State University. History. 2022. 4. PP. 43-52.
Issue
No 4 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
Section
Archaeology

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)