Lepel district gentry at the turn of 18th–19th centuries
Abstract
The question of the distribution of the Belarusian gentry in cities, towns and rural settlements is poorly understood in Belarusian historiography. Specific data on the level of mobility of the Belarusian nobility are missing in the scientific literature. This determines the relevance of this study. The aim of the article is to clarify the place of residence of the Lepel district gentry of the Viciebsk province of the Russian Empire at the turn of 18th–19th centuries and to determine their level of mobility. The author of the article on the basis of archival sources comes to the following conclusions. Agriculture was the basis of the gentry’s activities, it identified as the main places of residence of its representatives villages, «okolitsy» and «zastenki» (about 77 % of the gentry of the Lepel district). About 4 % of the gentry of the Lepel district lived in townships. The proportion of gentry in towns was about 3 %. In the landed estates lived about 11 % of the Lepel district gentry. The «okolitsy» met most rarely in Lepel district among the settlements located in the countryside. The gentry changed their place of residence, first of all, in search of more favorable conditions for the lease of land, service in landlord estates, as well as for family reasons. The population of «zastenki», as a rule, did not exceed 20 people. For objective reasons, it was not possible to find out the place of residence of 5 % of the gentry of the district. Szlachta of the Lepel district was distinguished by a high level of its mobility: in the period from 1795 to 1819, at least 24 % of the gentry changed their residence, which seriously hampered the registration of this category of population in the Russian Empire.
References
- Lougovtsova SL. The main activities of Lepel district gentry at the first third of the 19th century. In: Yanovskii OA, editor. Rossijskie i slavyanskie issledovaniya. Vypusk 11 [Russian and Slavic studies. Issue 11]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. p. 18–23. Russian.
- Kozlovskii PG. Zemlevladenie i zemlepol’zovanie v Belorussii v XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v. [Land tenure and land use in Belarus in the 18th – the first half of the 19th century]. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika; 1982. 204 p. Russian.
- Hammel E, Laslett P. Comparing household structures over time and between cultures. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1974;16(1):73–109. DOI: 10.1017/S0010417500007362.
- Lougovtsova SL. [To the question of the marriage structure of the Belarusian gentry in the first quarter of XIX century]. In: Janowskaja VV, Zjanjuk RU, compilers. Gistaryjagrafija i krynicy vyvuchjennja gistoryi Belarusi: tradycyi i navacyi [Historiography and sources of studying the history of Belarus: traditions and innovations]. Danilovich VV, editor. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2018. p. 112–119. Russian.
- Patotski L. Uspaminy pra Tyshkevychavu Svіslach, Dzyarechyn i Ruzhany [Memories about Tyszkiewicz’ Svisloch, Derechin and Ruzhany]. Salamevich IU, translator. Minsk: Polymja; 1997. 269 p. Belarusian.
- Bulgaryn F. Vybranae [Selected works]. Fiaduta A, compiler. Minsk: Belaruski knigazbor; 2003. 592 p. Belarusian.
- Koshman LV. Gorod i gorodskaya zhizn’ v Rossii XIX stoletiya: sotsial’nye i kul’turnye aspekty [City and city life in Russia of the 19th century: social and cultural aspects]. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2008. 448 p. Russian.
- Sikorska-Kulesza I. Deklasacja drobnej szlachty na Litwie i Bialorusi w XIX wieku. Pruszkow: Ajaks; 1995. 113 s.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)