Reform of secondary military educational institutions in Russia and its fate (1917–1918)
Abstract
The article, through the prism of a value approach, examines the reform of secondary military educational institutions (cadet corps) in Russia, carried out under the Provisional Government. The preparatory measures, the creation and activities of the commission for the reorganisation of military educational institutions under the leadership of general Z. A. Maksheev are revealed. It is noted that in March – July 1917, the commission did a lot of work to reorganise the military school on a broad democratic basis. From the 1917/18 academic year, access to the cadet corps was open to children of all classes. In order to create equal conditions for admission to state support, the requirements for exams were lowered, and instead of a competition, a ballot system was introduced. In the course of the reform, the cadet corps were transformed into gymnasiums of the military department and acquired the character of general educational institutions (ranks and drill classes were canceled, weapons and banners were confiscated, and civilians were allowed to fill all positions). Measures were taken to simplify the life of pupils and to serve their own needs, the creation of student organisations was allowed. The management of gymnasiums was established on the principle of trust in the staff (most issues were decided by the pedagogical council). It is concluded that the coming to power in October 1917 of the Bolsheviks led to the rejection of the reform. Since the majority of the cadet community, formed under the imperial government and brought up in a monarchical spirit, did not recognise the Soviet government, the gymnasiums of the military department were abolished in July 1918.
References
- Volkov SV. Russkii ofitserskii korpus [Russian officer corps]. Moscow: Voenizdat; 1993. 368 p. Russian.
- Mihajlov AA. Rukovodstvo voennym obrazovaniem v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX – nachale XX veka [Management of military education in Russia in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries]. Pskov: Izdatel’stvo Pskovskogo oblastnogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikatsii rabotnikov obrazovaniya; 1999. 463 p. Russian.
- Korovin VM. Voennoe obrazovanie v Rossiiskoi imperii (seredina XIX – nachalo XX veka) [Military education in the Russian Empire (mid 19th – early 20th century)]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University; 2009. 704 p. Russian.
- Lelina EI. [Main directorate of military educational institutions in the revolutionary events of 1917]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History. 2007;2:192–195. Russian.
- Samovich AL. Voennaya shkola Rossii v 1914–1920 gg.: kadetskie korpusa [The military school of Russia in 1914–1920: cadet corps]. Moscow: Sputnik+; 2002. 50 p. Russian.
- Shajkow V, Lukashjevich A. [Polotsk cadet corps and its pupils]. Belaruski gistarychny chasopis. 1999;4:45–51. Belarusian.
- Ramazanov SP. Problema tsennosti v istorii: istoriograficheskie i metodologicheskie aspekty [The problem of value in history: historiographical and methodological aspects]. Volgograd: Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel’stvo; 2006. 127 p. Russian.
- Shepeljov LE. Tituly, mundiry, ordena Rossiiskoi imperii [Titles, uniforms, orders of the Russian Empire]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf; 2004. 423 p. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)