Reporting of the 1920 Turkish-Armenian War in the Armenian press
Abstract
The article studies the reporting of the events of 1920 Turkish-Armenian War in Armenian press. The corresponding analysis of the «Yaraj» (Yerevan), «Mshak» (Tiflis), «Arev» (Alexandria) and «Hayrenik» (Boston) newspaper publications for August 1920 – February 1921 allows us to find out position of Armenian socio-political circles regarding possible developments of relations and ongoing military conflict between Turkey and Armenia. It shows that Armenian political elites overestimated their own capacities and underestimated the ones of the Kemalist Turkey, and it greatly influenced the former political decisions. The support of Turkey by Soviet Russia and the inactivity of Western allies of Armenia was also widely discussed in that time Armenian press. On the one hand, the opposition press blamed the government of the Republic of Armenia for that situation, on the other hand, the periodicals of the Armenian revolutionary federation «Dashnaktsutyun» tried to show that external factors had played their decisive role, and that the defeat in the war had been inevitable. The Armenian diaspora press mostly received information with a major delay: outdated and often untrue news circulated for a long time. One of the most memorable examples was the news about the recapture of the city of Kars by the Armenians. The study of the Armenian press before the war shows that both the government of the Republic of Armenia and the main opposition forces did not found their political calculations on adequate assessments of the regional and international situation and thus made their attempts to predict the events, and they accepted their desires instead of reality. It was for this reason that the disastrous consequences of the war had an effect of a cold shower for the Armenian community.
References
- Kevorkian R. The Armenian genocide: a complete history. London: I. B. Tauris; 2011. 1029 p.
- Safrastyan R. Mustafa Kemal. Struggle against the Republic of Armenia (1919–1921). Yerevan: Tir Publishing House; 2019. 140 p. Armenian.
- Hovannisian RG. The Republic of Armenia. Volume 4, Between crescent and sickle: partition and sovietisation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996. 496 p.
- Zohrabyan E. The Turkish-Armenian War of 1920 and the powers. Yerevan: Voskan Yerevantsi; 1997. 366 p. Armenian.
- Artsruni V. The Armenian-Turkish War. Yerevan: Mughni; 2002. 456 p. Armenian.
- Khurshudyan L. The partition of Armenia in 1920. Yerevan: Yerevan State University Press; 2002. 315 p. Armenian.
- Hakobyan A. The military-political situation of the Republic of Armenia in 1920. Yerevan: Institute of History of the National Academy of Sciences of Republic of Armenia; 2022. 509 p. Armenian.
- Kayali H. The struggle for independence. In: Kasaba R, editor. The Cambridge history of Turke. Volume 4, Turkey in the modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 112–146.
- Hakobyan A. History of the periodical press of the Republic of Armenia (1918–1920). Yerevan: [s. n.]; 2005. 64 p. Armenian.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)