Contemporary historiography on the phenomenon of the social cohesion in the period of the Second World War

  • Liudmila V. Alieva Pskov State University, 2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-3207
  • Lidia V. Antonova Pskov State University, 2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000, Russia
  • Tatiana G. Khrishkevich Pskov State University, 2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000, Russia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/2520-6338-2019-4-7-16

Abstract

The historiography of World War II is one of the most extensive research topics in historical science. Over the years, a comprehensive study of the military, political and economic history of wartime has been conducted. Particular attention during recent decades has been given to the social aspects of the war. However, the topic of social cohesion in the warring countries remains insufficiently analyzed. Thus, the main objective of the article is to analyze the current state of research on social cohesion in the context of World War II in contemporary British, German and Russian historical literature. The present study of the reflection of cohesion problems in Soviet Union, Great Britain and Germany during World War II is based on the principles of a new interdisciplinary branch of social science – anthropology of war. It integrates the achievements, subject areas and research tools of history, sociology, military psychology, cultural studies, pedagogy, medicine and other disciplines that study the existence of people and society at large in wartime conditions. A comparative analysis of the chosen historiography shows that at the present stage there is a commonality of approaches among historians related to interest in certain personalities, everyday life during World War II and war’s gender dimension. The differences in assessments and methods are determined by the role and place of a particular state in the military-political confrontation as well as by prevailing historiographical paradigms. In any case, the theme of social cohesion was not adequately reflected in these studies. In conclusion, the authors note the research potential of analyzing the problems of social cohesion during World War II.

Author Biographies

Liudmila V. Alieva, Pskov State University, 2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000, Russia

PhD (history), docent; associate professor at the department of Russian history, faculty of history

Lidia V. Antonova, Pskov State University, 2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000, Russia

PhD (history); senior lecturer at the department of world history and area studies, faculty of history

Tatiana G. Khrishkevich, Pskov State University, 2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000, Russia

PhD (history), docent; associate professor at the department of world history and area studies, faculty of history

References

  1. Senyavskaya ES. Military anthropology: experience of formation and development of new scientific branch. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 March 21];1–2. Available from: https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/168. Russian.
  2. Kasimov RN. [The Great Patriotic War as a symbol in Russians collective memory]. In: Zagrebin AE, Vorontsov VS, Kasimov RN, Chernienko DA, editors. Istoriko-kul’turnoe nasledie slavyanskikh narodov Volgo-Kamskogo regiona: nauchnyi al’manakh [Historical and cultural heritage of the Slavic peoples of the Volga-Kama region: scientific almanac]. Izhevsk: Shelest; 2017. p. 159–168. Russian.
  3. Naumenko VE. «...Those who gives up without a fight for his home and village, he is not a man» (the Great Patriotic War in the perception of the Ingush people). Naslediye vekov [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 May 17];1:63–71. Available from: http://heritage-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/2015_1_Naumenko.pdf. Russian.
  4. Shabel’nikova NA. [A Great Victory in the memory of generations: World War II in contemporary historiography of the Far East]. Klio. 2019;1:36–42. Russian.
  5. Vorobyov SV, Kashirina TV. Historiography of the collaboration in the occupied European and Soviet territories during the Second World War. Voprosy istorii. 2019;6:157–169. DOI: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii201905Statyi03. Russian.
  6. Kamardina NV. State and ideology: the experience of the Soviet past (an example of Far East society in 1941–1945). Vestnik KRAUNTS. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2016;2:7–11. Russian.
  7. Kavalenia AA. The ideological and political defending of the Belarusian statehood in the years of the Great Patriotic War. Journal of the Belarusian State University. History. 2018;4:10–18. Russian.
  8. Kovalenya AA. To defend the truth of the Great Patriotic War. Problemy upravleniya. 2015;2:25–32. Russian.
  9. Chubaryan AO. World War II in contemporary historiography and public consciousness. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2016;86(5):387–391. DOI: 10.7868/S0869587316050042. Russian.
  10. Khrishkevich TG. World War II in the Perception of the Modern Germans: Defeat or Liberation? Metamorphoses of History. 2015;6:10–20. Russian.
  11. Vdovin A. The Great Patriotic War and the new national policy in the USSR. Svobodnaya mysl’. 2015;6:93–114. Russian.
  12. Bykovskaya GA, Makedonskaya VA. Orthodoxy and fascism through years of Second World War: contradictions of connections. Sovremennye problemy gumanitarnykh i obshchestvennykh nauk. 2016;2:31–36. Russian.
  13. Tsekhanskaya KV. War and faith: the religious aspect of the development of the Soviet people in the years of the Great Patriotic War. Metamorphoses of History. 2019;13:19–51. Russian.
  14. Shkarovskii MV. Natsistskaya Germaniya i Pravoslavnaya Tserkov’: natsistskaya politika v otnoshenii Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi i religioznoe vozrozhdenie na okkupirovannoi territorii SSSR [Nazi Germany and the Orthodox church: Nazi policy towards the Orthodox church and religious revival in the occupied territory of the USSR]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Krutitskogo Patriarshego podvor’ya; 2002. 524 p. Co-published by the «Obshchestvo lyubitelei tserkovnoi istorii». Russian.
  15. Surkova IY. Social inclusion and solidarity as principles of the modern Russian patriotism formation. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies. 2012;3:160–167. Russian.
  16. Ushakova NV. [The Great Patriotic War my family’s history: my grandfather – Semen Andreevich Malchenko]. Severnyi region: nauka, obrazovanie, kul’tura. 2015;1:189–190. Russian.
  17. Yurakov DM, Starunskaya AA. [The Great Patriotic War through the eyes of my family]. Kontsept [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 June 7];25:6–10. Available from: https://e-koncept.ru/2015/65304.htm. Russian.
  18. Burmistrova Elizaveta E, Burmistrova Ekaterina E. The Great Patriotic war in the history of my family. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya. 2017;12(2):38–40. Russian.
  19. Alieva LV, Filippova TV. The female face of the War: women images in poster art at the period of World War II. Metamorphoses of History. 2015;6:21–47. Russian.
  20. Barsukova NV. [Soviet women on the defense of the country during the Great Patriotic War]. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2017;5–3:29–31. Russian.
  21. Shunyakov DV. «Female gender» in war. Female solders award with orders and medals in Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945. Voenno-istoricheskii zhurnal. 2019;3:82–86. Russian.
  22. Reynolds D. Britain, the Two World Wars, and the Problem of Narrative. The Historical Journal. 2017;60(1):197–231. DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X16000509.
  23. Kramer A. Recent Historiography of the First World War (Part I). Journal of Modern European History. 2014;12(1):5–28. DOI: 10.17104/1611-8944_2014_1_5.
  24. Jones H, Kandiah M, editors. The Myth of Consensus: New Views on British History, 1945–64. London: Springer; 1996. 186 p.
  25. Harris J. War and Social History: Britain and the Home Front during the Second World War. Contemporary European History. 1992;1(1):17–35. DOI: 10.1017/S096077730000504X.
  26. Calder A. The Myth of the Blitz. London: Pimlico; 2012. 320 p.
  27. Smith HL. Britain in the Second World War: A social history. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1996. 189 p.
  28. Geyer M, Tooze A, editors. The Cambridge History of the Second World War. Volume III. Total War: Economy, Society and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. 833 p.
  29. Fox J. Careless Talk: Tensions within British Domestic Propaganda during the Second World War. Journal of British Studies. 2012;51(4):936–966. DOI: 10.1086/666741.
  30. Rose SO. Which People’s War? National Identity and Citizenship in Wartime Britain, 1939–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. 328 p.
  31. Vickers E. «The Forgotten Army of the Woods»: The Women’s Timber Corps during the Second World War. The Agricultural History Review. 2011;59(1):101–112.
  32. Gazeley I. Women’s pay in British industry during the Second World War. The Economic History Review. New Series. 2008;61(3):651–671. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2007.00412.x.
  33. Taylor M. The People’s Game and the People’s War: Football, Class and Nation in Wartime Britain, 1939–1945. Historical Social Research. 2015;40(4):270–297. DOI: 10.12759/hsr.40.2015.4.270-297.
  34. Broszat М. Zakat tysyacheletnego reikha [Sunset of the Millennium Reich]. Moscow: Yauza; 2005. 288 p. Co-published by the «Eksmo». Russian.
  35. Ludtke A. Istoriya povsednevnosti v Germanii: novye podkhody k izucheniyu truda, voiny i vlasti [The history of everyday life in Germany: new approaches to the study of labor, war and power]. Zhuravlev SV, editor. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2010. 270 p. Russian.
  36. Maser W. Das Regime: Alltag in Deutschland 1933–1945. Berlin: Dietz Verlag; 1990. 461 S.
  37. Grube F, Richter G. Alltag im Dritten Reich: So lebten die Deutschen 1933–1945. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag; 1982. 152 S.
  38. Nolte E. Der Faschismus in seiner Epoche: Die Action frangaise. Der italienische Faschismus. Der Nationalsozialismus. München: R. Piper & Co. Verlag; 1963. 633 S. Russian edition: Nolte E. Fashizm v ego epokhe: Aks’on Fransez. Ital’yanskii fashizm. Natsional-sotsializm. Fedorov AI, translator. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf; 2001. 568 p.
  39. Bach M, Breuer S. Faschismus als Bewegung und Regime: Italien und Deutschland im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag; 2010. 420 S.
  40. Frei N. Der Führerstaat: nationalsozialistische Herrschaft 1933 bis 1945. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; 2001. 335 S. Russian edition: Frеi N. Gosudarstvo fyurera. Natsional-sotsialisty u vlasti: Germaniya, 1933–1945. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2009. 256 p.
  41. Fest IK. Gitler: biografiya [Hitler: biography]. Sluch SZ, Rakhshmir PYu, editors. Perm: Kul’turnyi tsentr «Aleteia»; 1993. 3 volumes. Russian.
  42. Maser W. Adol’f Gitler: legenda, mif, real’nost’ [Adolf Hitler: legend, myth and reality]. Yasinskaya LI, Zavgorodnyaya GS, translators. Rostov on Don: Feniks; 1998. 603 p. Russian.
  43. Mommsen H. Gitler, nemtsy i 2-ya mirovaya voina [Hitler, Germans and World War II]. Moscow: German historical institute; 2008. 28 p. Russian.
  44. Knopp G. Generaly Tret’ego reikha [Generals of the Third Reich]. Moscow: Astrel’; 2006. 511 p. Russian.
  45. Ackermann J. Heinrich Himmler als Ideologe. Göttingen: Musterschmidt; 1970. 317 S.
  46. Wildt M. Geschichte des Nationalsozialismus. Stuttgart: UTB; 2008. 219 S.
  47. Mommsen H. Die Realisierung des Utopischen: Die «Endlösung der Judenfrage» im «Dritten Reich». Geschichte und Gesellschaft. 1983;9(3):381–420.
  48. Knopp G. «Deti» Gitlera [Hitler’s Children]. Moscow: Olma-Press; 2004. 285 p. Russian.
  49. Bennecke H. Hitler und die SA. München: Günter Olzog Verlag; 1962. 230 S.
  50. Corni G, Gies H. Blut und Boden: Rassenideologie und Agrarpolitik im Staat Hitlers. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag; 1994. 227 S.
  51. Gorlitz W. Germanskii General’nyi shtab: istoriya i struktura, 1657–1945 [The German General staff: its history and structure, 1657–1945]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf; 2005. 478 p. Russian.
  52. Mommsen H. [Opposition to Hitler and German society in 1933–1945]. In: Mikhalka V, editor. Vtoraya mirovaya voina: Diskussii. Osnovnye tendentsii. Rezul’taty issledovanii [The Second World War: Discussions. The main trends. Research results]. Moscow: Ves’ mir; 1997. p. 263–276. Russian.
  53. Dieckmann C, Quinkert B, Tönsmeyer T, Editoren. Kooperation und Verbrechen: Formen der Kollaboration in Südost- und Osteuropa 1939–1945. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag; 2005. 320 S. (Beiträge zur Geschichte des Nationalsozialismus; 19).
  54. Longerich P. Politik der Vernichtung. Eine Gesamtdarstellung der nationalsozialistischen Judenverfolgung. München: Piper; 1998. 772 S.
  55. Angrick A. Besatzungspolitik und Massenmord: Die Einsatzgruppe D in der südlichen Sowjetunion 1941–1943. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition; 2003. 796 S.
  56. Müller K-D, Nikischkin K, Wagenlehner G, Editoren. Die Tragödie der Gefangenschaft in Deutschland und der Sowjetunion 1941–1956. Köln: Verlag Böhlau; 1998. 478 S.
  57. Müller R-D, Volkmann H-E, Editoren. Die Wehrmacht. Mythos und Realität. Oldenburg: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag; 1999. 1332 S.
  58. Latzel K. Deutsche Soldaten – nationalsozialistischer Krieg? Kriegserlebnis – Kriegserfahrung 1939–1945. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh; 1998. 429 S.
  59. Rass C. «Menschenmaterial»: Deutsche Soldaten an der Ostfront. Innenansichten einer Infanteriedivision 1939–1945. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh; 2003. 486 S.
Published
2019-10-28
Keywords: social cohesion, historiography, World War II, Great Patriotic War, Russia, Germany, Great Britain
How to Cite
Alieva L. V., Antonova L. V., Khrishkevich T. G. Contemporary historiography on the phenomenon of the social cohesion in the period of the Second World War // Journal of the Belarusian State University. History. 2019. 4. PP. 7-16.
Issue
No 4 (2019): Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
Section
Special Topic Section

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)