Activities of the Сuratorship of Empress Maria Alexandrovna about the blind in the Belarusian provinces of the Russian Empire (late 19th – early 20th centuries)
Abstract
The Curatorship of Empress Maria Alexandrovna about the blind made a great contribution to the development of charity in the Russian Empire which at that time included the Belarusian lands. In the Belarusian provinces, the Office became the first institution to focus on giving aid to blind people. The purpose of the article is to review the activities of the Belarusian branches of the Curatorship of Empress Maria Alexandrovna about the blind and to show their contribution to the development of social assistance and the struggle with blindness in our country. This topic hasn’t been thoroughly studied in native historiography yet and thus it remains relevant for a research. Besides this, in modern Republic of Belarus the traditions of private charity which had been interrupted in the Soviet period began to revive, this obviously increasing the interest to the experience of charity institutions of the past. The article regards the formation and development of the branches of the Curatorship in the Belarusian provinces of the Russian Empire. The main forms and methods of their activity as well as the sources of financing are identified. The main achievements and results of their work are analyzed. The assembled material gives an idea of the condition of the charity system of the blind in the Belarusian lands in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The research is based on the materials obtained in national and Russian libraries, a number of sources being introduced into scientific circulation for the first time.
References
- Kupreev DV. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa i yuridicheskoi prirody blagotvoritel’nykh vedomstv imperatritsy Marii Fedorovny [Features of the legal status and legal nature of the Empress Mary’s Office of Institutions]. Obshchestvo i pravo. 2006;2:188–190. Russian.
- Shimukovich SF. Blagotvoritel’nost’ v Belarusi v kontse XIX – nachale XX veka [Charity in Belarus in the late 19th – early 20th centuries]. Minsk: Academy of Public Administration under the aegis of the President of the Republic of Belarus; 2006. 187 p. Russian.
- Khitrov AA. A Charitable social and medical aid to the blind in Russia under the patronate of the emperors’ family (the second half of the 19th – the beginning of the 20th centuries)]. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Istoriya. 2008;4(1):54–60. Russian.
- Galimova YuSh. Creation of inpatient ophthalmological care system in Ufa in the early 20th century. RUDN Journal of Russian History. 2018;17(3):696–717. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2018-17-3-696-717. Russian.
- Blagotvoritel’nost’ v Rossii. Sostavleno po Vysochaishemu poveleniyu Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyariei po uchrezhdeniyam Imperatritsy Marii. Tom 1 [Charity in Russia. Compiled by the highest command of his own Imperial Majesty’s office on the institutions of the Empress Mary. Volume 1]. Saint Petersburg: [s. n.]; 1907. 601 p. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)