Semantic features of two-object verbal phraseological units with the meaning of the relation
Abstract
In the article the author examines the verbal phraseological units of the modern Belarusian language with the semantic meaning of the relation of a two-object external orientation (to a human object or to a non-human object). The author has established that with the direction of the action (process) phraseological units form five semantic subgroups on the objectperson (dominant influence, verbal influence, emotional influence, assistance, and contact) within the semantic group of interpersonal (social) relations. The author substantiates the idea that when an action (process) is directed at a specific subject, phraseological units can develop a new meaning and relate to the semantic group of personal-subject relations or completely change their subcategorical meaning. The transition of phraseological units into the subcategory of the state is facilitated by the actualisation of the connotative macro component in the structure of phraseological meaning by the contextual environment. Phraseological units begin to function in impersonal use with a modal meaning of the necessity or impossibility of carrying out an action (process), which is characteristic of the units of the subcategory of the state. The results obtained can be used in the practice of teaching phraseology in institutions of higher and general secondary education, as well as in the theory and practice of phraseography.
References
- Aksamitaw AS. Belaruskaja frazealogija [Belarusian phraseology]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola; 1978. 224 p. Belarusian.
- Kirillova NN. On the denotate of phraseological semantics. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1986;1:82–90. Russian.
- Marsheuskaya VV. [Subcategorical meaning of verbal phraseological units]. Belaruskaja mova і lіtaratura. 2022;8:51–55. Belarusian.
- Marsheuskaya VV. [Verbal phraseological units with the meaning of interpersonal links relations]. Rodnae slova. 2022;8:71–74. Belarusian.
- Marsheuskaya VV. Syntactic functioning of verbal phraseological units with atypical structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Humanitarian Series. 2021;66(4):443 – 449. Belarusian. DOI: 10.29235/2524-2369-2021-66-4-443-449.
- Gaisina RM, Zakharova IA, Ivanova LA, Rodionova AE, Samokhina LA. Kategoriya otnosheniya v yazyke [The category of relations in language]. Gaisina RM, editor. Ufa: Bashkirskii gosudarstvennyi universitet; 1997. 173 p. Russian. EDN: VYHTZD.
- Kazachuk IG. Processual’nye frazeologizmy russkogo yazyka (kategorii bytiya i otnosheniya) [Procedural phraseological units of the Russian language (categories of being and relations)]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet; 2004. 310 p. Russian. EDN: WIYLLD.
- Marsheuskaya VV. Features of the semantic structure of verbal phraseological units of the Belarusian language with the meaning of the state. Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics. 2023;2:115–127. Russian. DOI: 10.22405/2712-8407-2023-2-115-127.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)