The cult of Saint Gabriel of Slutsk and its reflection in the narratives of the turn of the 19th–20th centuries
Abstract
The article considers the political and symbolic aspect of the cult of Saint Gabriel of Slutsk in the late 19th – early 20th century. On the basis of analysing the collections of sources which have different origins (journalism, hagiography, hymnography), three narrative traditions of the perception of the martyr figure are distinguished. Those are Grodna, Minsk, and conditionally distinguished anti-Jewish, to which the researchers of the cult of the saint most often pay attention. The genesis of the three traditions and their relation to each other is studied. The author substantiates the point of view, according to which dioceses Gabriel was perceived as a local saint in the lands of Minsk and Grodna during the mentioned period. The fact affirms the belonging of the population of this territory to the Orthodox Church. It is noted that the Grodna and Minsk narrative traditions did not compete with each other and mutually complemented each other. They almost did not intersect with the antiJewish narrative, which was constructed by individual radical publicists from other regions of the Russian Empire.
References
- Kizenko N. Blood accusation and Orthodox liturgy in the Russian Empire before and after the Beilis Case. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. 2020;36(1):179–195. Russian. DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2020.115.
- Panchenko AA. [On the study of the «Jewish theme» in the history of Russian literature: the plot of a ritual murder]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2010;4:79–113. Russian.
- Kuryłowicz A. Kult świętego męczennika Młodzieńca Gabriela. Elpis. 1999;1:213–241. DOI: 10.15290/elpis.1999.01.13.
- Sosna G. Święte miejsca i cudowne ikony. Prawosławne sanktuaria na Białostocczyźnie. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Orthdruk; 2001. 401 s.
- Kravetskii AG. Hate speech and church Slavonic literature. History of the editing of liturgical books. Slavic Studies. 2023;2:31–46. Russian. DOI: 10.31857/S0869544X0025350–8.
- Węgrzynek H. Blood libel accusations in Old Poland (mid-16th – mid-17th centuries). In: World Union of Jewish Studies. Proceedings of the 12th World congress of Jewish studies; 1997 July 29 – August 5; Jerusalem, Israel. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies; 1997. p. 121–127.
- Staliunas D. Enemies for a day: antisemitism and anti-Jewish violence in Lithuania under the Tsars. New York: CEU Press; 2015. 283 p.
- Kochegarov KA. The Kievan metropolia, prince Jeronime Radzivill, and the nominatin of David Nischinsky as the archimandrite of Slutzk in 1755. Istoricheskii vestnik. 2020;33:110–137. Russian.
- Kochegarov KA. Mikhail Kozačinski and his appointment as an archimandrite of the Slutsk holy trinity monastery. 1748–1749. Roczniki Humanistyczne. 2022;70(2):69–87. Russian. DOI: 10.18290/rh2272.5.
- Avrutin E. Velizhskoe delo. Ritual’noe ubiistvo v odnom russkom gorode [The Velizh affair. The ritual murder in a Russian town]. Glebovskaya AV, translator; Znayesheva IV, editor. Saint Petersburg: BiblioRossika; 2020. 239 p. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Belarusian State University. History
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)